Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2122044.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.22044.

Home Hazard Removal to Reduce Falls Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Home Hazard Removal to Reduce Falls Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Susan Stark et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Falls are the leading preventable cause of morbidity, mortality, and premature institutionalization for community-dwelling older adults.

Objective: To test the effectiveness of a behavioral intervention on fall risk among older adults receiving services from an Area Agency on Aging.

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized clinical trial examined a home hazard removal intervention in the community using a race- and sex-stratified randomization design. Older adults receiving services from the Area Agency on Aging in urban St Louis, Missouri, were assigned to a home hazard removal intervention delivered over 2 weeks with a 6-month booster or usual care control. Eligible participants were adults aged 65 years or older who did not have dementia, were at high risk for falling, and resided in the community. Enrollment occurred from January 2015 to September 2016; 12-month follow-up occurred from February 2016 to October 2017. Data were analyzed from February 2019 to July 2021.

Interventions: The intervention was a home hazard removal program delivered by an occupational therapist in the home that included a comprehensive clinical assessment and a tailored hazard removal plan. Usual care control consisted of annual assessments and community referral.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the hazard of a fall over 12 months. Prespecified secondary outcomes included the rate of falls over 12 months, daily activity performance, falls self-efficacy, and self-reported quality of life.

Results: A total of 310 participants (mean [SD] age, 75 [7.4] years; 229 [74%] women; 161 Black participants [52%]) were randomized, with 155 participants assigned to the intervention and 155 participants assigned to usual care. Retention was 127 participants (82%) in the intervention group and 126 participants (81%) in the control group. There was no difference for our primary outcome of fall hazard (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.66-1.27). There was a 38% reduction in the rate of falling in the intervention group compared with the control group (relative risk, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40-0.95; P = .03). At 12 months, the rate of falls per person-year was 1.5 (95% CI, 1.32-1.75) in the intervention group and 2.3 (95% CI, 2.08-2.60) in the control group. There was no difference in daily activity performance (adjusted difference, -0.20; 95% CI, -0.95 to 0.55; P = .60), falls self-efficacy (adjusted difference, -0.12; 95% CI, -1.25 to 1.01; P = .84), or quality of life (adjusted difference, 0.84; 95% CI, -0.95 to 2.64; P = .35).

Conclusions and relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that a brief home hazard removal program did not reduce the hazard of falls among community-dwelling older adults at high risk for falling. The intervention was effective in achieving a reduced rate of falls, a prespecified secondary outcome. This effectiveness study has the potential for delivery through the national aging services network.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02392013.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Stark reported receiving grants from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development during the conduct of the study and nonfinancial support from Staying at Home Matters outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Screening, Randomization, and Follow-up of Participants
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Time to First Fall by Treatment Group
Participants in the intervention group had no statistically different hazard of falling compared with the control group (hazard ratio = 0.9, 95% CI, 0.66-1.27; P = .59). HARP indicates home hazard removal program.

Comment in

References

    1. Tinetti ME, Speechley M, Ginter SF. Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(26):1701-1707. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198812293192604 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sattin RW, Rodriguez JG, DeVito CA, Wingo PA; Study to Assess Falls Among the Elderly (SAFE) Group . Home environmental hazards and the risk of fall injury events among community-dwelling older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46(6):669-676. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb03799.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tinetti ME, Williams CS. Falls, injuries due to falls, and the risk of admission to a nursing home. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(18):1279-1284. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710303371806 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sattin RW. Falls among older persons: a public health perspective. Annu Rev Public Health. 1992;13:489-508. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.13.050192.002421 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alexander BH, Rivara FP, Wolf ME. The cost and frequency of hospitalization for fall-related injuries in older adults. Am J Public Health. 1992;82(7):1020-1023. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.82.7.1020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data