Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul 20:4:83-100.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-092820-025214. Epub 2021 Apr 23.

Phenotyping Neurodegeneration in Human iPSCs

Affiliations
Review

Phenotyping Neurodegeneration in Human iPSCs

Jonathan Li et al. Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci. .

Abstract

Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology holds promise for modeling neurodegenerative diseases. Traditional approaches for disease modeling using animal and cellular models require knowledge of disease mutations. However, many patients with neurodegenerative diseases do not have a known genetic cause. iPSCs offer a way to generate patient-specific models and study pathways of dysfunction in an in vitro setting in order to understand the causes and subtypes of neurodegeneration. Furthermore, iPSC-based models can be used to search for candidate therapeutics using high-throughput screening. Here we review how iPSC-based models are currently being used to further our understanding of neurodegenerative diseases, as well as discuss their challenges and future directions.

Keywords: iPSC; neurodegeneration; omics; phenotype.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Studying neurodegenerative diseases using iPSC models.
(a) Somatic cells from patients are reprogrammed into iPSCs which are then differentiated into patient-specific brain cells. (b) Cells undergo cellular and molecular phenotyping. (c) These phenotypes are used for downstream analyses and high-throughput screening. (d) Results of these experiments are used to derive insights into patient subgroups, disease mechanisms, and candidate therapeutics, ultimately leading to new hypotheses for further testing.

References

    1. Petrov D, Mansfield C, Moussy A, Hermine O. 2017. ALS Clinical Trials Review: 20 Years of Failure. Are We Any Closer to Registering a New Treatment? Front. Aging Neurosci 9: - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mehta D, Jackson R, Paul G, Shi J, Sabbagh M. 2017. Why do trials for Alzheimer’s disease drugs keep failing? A discontinued drug perspective for 2010–2015. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 26(6):735–39 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gan L, Cookson MR, Petrucelli L, La Spada AR. 2018. Converging pathways in neurodegeneration, from genetics to mechanisms. Nat. Neurosci 21(10):1300–1309 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taylor JP, Brown RH, Cleveland DW. 2016. Decoding ALS: From Genes to Mechanism. Nature. 539(7628):197–206 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hodge RD, Bakken TE, Miller JA, Smith KA, Barkan ER, et al. 2019. Conserved cell types with divergent features in human versus mouse cortex. Nature. 573(7772):61–68 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types