Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan-Feb;48(1):38-44.
doi: 10.1016/j.semerg.2021.07.010. Epub 2021 Aug 29.

[Adequacy of the prescription of vitamin D in Primary Care]

[Article in Spanish]
Affiliations

[Adequacy of the prescription of vitamin D in Primary Care]

[Article in Spanish]
A Abril Rubio et al. Semergen. 2022 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the adequacy of vitamin D treatment based on clinic evidence in a Primary Care Center as well as to analyze some characteristics of the prescriptions made.

Materials and methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study. Primary Care. Patients above 14 years old with vitamin D prescription. Main variable was the therapeutic adequacy with vitamin D compounds (adequacy was considered when there was a clinical indication for treatment and blood vitamin D levels below 20ng/ml). Other clinical variables were collected. Frequency and association measures were used for statistical analysis. Level of statistical significance was considered <0.05.

Results: 430 patients, 346 women (80.5%, 95% CI=77-84). Record of vitamin D values in 216 (50.2%, 95% CI=45-55). Screening/treatment indications in 219 patients (50.9%, 95% CI=46-56), of those in 150 patients vitamin D values were recorded (68.5%, 95% CI=62-75), average (±SD) was 21.22±12ng/ml, deficiency criteria in 86 (57.3%, 95% CI=51-64), insufficiency in 37 (24.7%, 95% CI=19-30) and sufficiency in 27 (18%, 95% CI=13-23). 86 patients (20%, 95% CI=16-24) had treatment indications plus vitamin D deficiency with no differences between genders.

Conclusions: Only 20% of the patients had treatment indications plus vitamin D deficiency. Female predominance. Just over half had indications for screening of serological vitamin D values and/or indications for treatment with vitamin D compounds.

Keywords: Atención Primaria de Salud; Cribado; Primary Health Care; Screening; Terapéutica; Therapeutics; Vitamin D; Vitamina D.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources