Reply
- PMID: 34468058
- DOI: 10.1002/uog.23748
Reply
Comment on
-
Outcome-based comparison of SMFM and ISUOG definitions of fetal growth restriction.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;57(6):925-930. doi: 10.1002/uog.23638. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33798274
-
Re: Outcome-based comparison of SMFM and ISUOG definitions of fetal growth restriction.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep;58(3):493-494. doi: 10.1002/uog.23747. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 34468059 No abstract available.
References
-
- Roeckner JT, Pressman K, Odibo L, Duncan JR, Odibo AO. An outcome-based comparison of two international guidelines for defining fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 57: 925-930.
-
- Lees CC, Stampalija T, Baschat A, da Silva Costa F, Ferrazzi E, Figueras F, Hecher K, Kingdom J, Poon LC, Salomon LJ, Unterscheider J. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56: 298-312.
-
- Martins JG, Biggio JR, Abuhamad A. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #52: Diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223: B2-B17.
-
- Molina LCG, Odibo L, Zientara S, Običan SG, Rodriguez A, Stout M, Odibo AO. Validation of Delphi procedure consensus criteria for defining fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56: 61-66.
-
- Ciobanu A, Formuso C, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 35-37 weeks' gestation: contribution of maternal factors and growth velocity between 20 and 36 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 488-495.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources