Plasmatic osteopontin and vascular access dysfunction in hemodialysis patients: a cross-sectional, case-control study (The OSMOSIS Study)
- PMID: 34468976
- DOI: 10.1007/s40620-021-01129-4
Plasmatic osteopontin and vascular access dysfunction in hemodialysis patients: a cross-sectional, case-control study (The OSMOSIS Study)
Abstract
Background and aims: Despite close follow-up of patients with native arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs), up to 10% experience thrombosis each year. The OSMOSIS Study (Osteopontin as a Marker of Stenosis) tested the hypothesis that the systemic osteopontin level, a pro-inflammatory mediator related to vascular remodelling and intimal hyperplasia, increases in AVF stenosis, and may be used in clinical surveillance.
Methods: Our cross-sectional study compared the level of plasmatic osteopontin (pOPN) between patients with a well-functioning AVF (control group) and patients who required revision of their AVF due to stenosis (stenosis group). Blood samples were collected before dialysis (control group) or before intervention (stenosis group) from the AVF arm, and from the opposite arm as a within-subject control. pOPN level was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Results: A total of 76 patients were included in the study. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups (mean age, 70 years; men, 63%; AVF duration, 39 months), apart from prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) (control group, 33%; stenosis group, 57%; p = 0.04). pOPN levels were similar between the AVF arm and the contralateral arm (551 ± 42 ng/mL vs. 521 ± 41 ng/mL, respectively, p = 0.11, paired t-test). Patients in the stenosis group displayed a higher pOPN level than patients in the control group (650.2 ± 59.8 ng/mL vs. 460.5 ± 61.2, respectively, p = 0.03; two-way ANOVA). T2D was not identified as an associated factor in a multivariate analysis (p = 0.50).
Conclusions: The level of pOPN in hemodialysis patients was associated with the presence of AVF stenosis requiring intervention. Thus, its potential as a diagnostic biomarker should be assessed in a vascular access surveillance program.
Keywords: Biomarkers; Hemodialysis access; Osteopontin; Surgical arteriovenous shunt.
© 2021. Italian Society of Nephrology.
References
-
- Bylsma LC, Gage SM, Reichert H, Dahl SLM, Lawson JH (2017) Arteriovenous fistulae for haemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 54:513–522 - PubMed
-
- Lambie SH, Taal MW, Fluck RJ, McIntyre CW (2004) Analysis of factors associated with variability in haemodialysis adequacy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19:406–412 - PubMed
-
- Vascular Access Work Group (2006) Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis 48(Suppl 1):S176-247
-
- Tonelli M, Jindal K, Hirsch D, Taylor S, Kane C, Henbrey S (2001) Screening for subclinical stenosis in native vessel arteriovenous fistulae. J Am Soc Nephrol 12:1729–1733 - PubMed
-
- Tessitore N, Bedogna V, Verlato G, Poli A (2014) Clinical access assessment. J Vasc Access 15:S20–S27 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
