Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb;18(2):127-136.
doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00198. Epub 2021 Sep 1.

Predictive Modeling for Adverse Events and Risk Stratification Programs for People Receiving Cancer Treatment

Affiliations
Review

Predictive Modeling for Adverse Events and Risk Stratification Programs for People Receiving Cancer Treatment

Chelsea K Osterman et al. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Emergency department visits and hospitalizations are common among people receiving cancer treatment, accounting for a large proportion of spending in oncology care and negatively affecting quality of life. As oncology care shifts toward value- and quality-based payment models, there is a need to develop interventions that can prevent these costly and low-value events among people receiving cancer treatment. Risk stratification programs have the potential to address this need and optimally would consist of three components: (1) a risk stratification algorithm that accurately identifies patients with modifiable risk(s), (2) intervention(s) that successfully reduce this risk, and (3) the ability to implement the risk algorithm and intervention(s) in an adaptable and sustainable way. Predictive modeling is a common method of risk stratification, and although a number of predictive models have been developed for use in oncology care, they have rarely been tested alongside corresponding interventions or developed with implementation in clinical practice as an explicit consideration. In this article, we review the available published predictive models for treatment-related toxicity or acute care events among people receiving cancer treatment and highlight challenges faced when attempting to use these models in practice. To move the field of risk-stratified oncology care forward, we argue that it is critical to evaluate predictive models alongside targeted interventions that address modifiable risks and to demonstrate that these two key components can be implemented within clinical practice to avoid unplanned acute care events among people receiving cancer treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Hanna K. SanoffResearch Funding: Bayer William A. WoodStock and Other Ownership Interests: Koneksa Health, Elektra LabsConsulting or Advisory Role: Koneksa, Best Doctors Inc, Elektra LabsResearch Funding: Genentech/Roche, Pfizer Jennifer Elston LafataEmployment: Humana (I)Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Humana (I)Research Funding: Genentech FoundationNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Comment in

References

    1. Jairam V, Lee V, Park HS, et al. : Treatment-related complications of systemic therapy and radiotherapy. JAMA Oncol 5:1028-1035, 2019 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brooks GA, Li L, Uno H, et al. : Acute hospital care is the chief driver of regional spending variation in medicare patients with advanced cancer. Health Aff 33:1793-1800, 2014 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wen L, Divers C, Lingohr-Smith M, et al. : Improving quality of care in oncology through healthcare payment reform. Am J Manag Care 24:e93-e98, 2018 - PubMed
    1. Oncology Care Model. CMS Innovation Center. https://innovation.cms.gov/innovation-models/oncology-care. 2020
    1. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services : Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program, 2021. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Inst...

Publication types