Risk Factors for Syphilis at a Large Urban Emergency Department
- PMID: 34471079
- DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001543
Risk Factors for Syphilis at a Large Urban Emergency Department
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of syphilis is increasing in the United States. The emergency department (ED) is an important setting to screen and treat underserved populations. To tailor testing protocols to the local population, we aimed to identify risk factors for syphilis positivity in ED patients.
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of ED patients who were screened for syphilis between November 2018 and August 2020. Patients were screened for Treponema pallidum antibody using a multiplex flow immunoassay, and positive results were confirmed by rapid plasma reagin or T. pallidum particle agglutination. Risk factors for new syphilis diagnoses were identified using multiple logistic regression.
Results: We screened 1974 patients for syphilis (mean age, 37 ± 16 years; 56% female). We identified 201 patients with new infections without previous treatment. Independent risk factors for a new diagnosis of syphilis included housing status (undomiciled, 23% [60 of 256]; domiciled, 9% [133 of 1559]; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.9 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.2-3.0]), history of HIV (positive, 44% [28 of 63]; negative, 9% [173 of 1893]; aOR, 5.8 [95% CI, 3.0-11.2]), tobacco use (positive, 15% [117 of 797]; negative, 4% [29 of 665]; aOR, 2.4 [95% CI, 1.5-3.9]), and illicit drug use (positive, 14% [112 of 812]; negative, 8% [52 of 678]; aOR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.0-2.5]).
Conclusions: Undomiciled housing status, history of HIV, history of tobacco use, and history of illicit drug use were independently associated with a new diagnosis of syphilis in the ED. Broadening targeted syphilis screening algorithms beyond sexually transmitted disease-related complaints could help identify new syphilis cases for treatment.
Copyright © 2021 American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest and Sources of Funding: None declared.
Comment in
-
Risk Factors for Syphilis at a Large Urban Emergency Department.Sex Transm Dis. 2022 Oct 1;49(10):e110. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001670. Epub 2022 Jul 6. Sex Transm Dis. 2022. PMID: 35797593 No abstract available.
-
In Response to the Letter From Martinez et al. Risk Factors for Syphilis at a Large Urban Emergency Department.Sex Transm Dis. 2022 Oct 1;49(10):e111. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001684. Epub 2022 Jul 29. Sex Transm Dis. 2022. PMID: 35921637 No abstract available.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Diseases—Reported Cases and Rates of Reported Cases*, United States, 1941–2019. STD Surveillance. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2019/tables/1.htm . Accessed March 13, 2021.
-
- California Department of Public Health, STD Control Branch. Department of Finance, E-6. Population estimates and components of change by county, July 1, 2010–2018. Available at: https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/CDPH%20Document%20Library/STD-... . Accessed March 13, 2021.
-
- Kuehn BM. Dramatic increase in US congenital syphilis cases. JAMA 2020; 324:328.
-
- Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, et al. Screening for syphilis infection in nonpregnant adults and adolescents: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA 2016; 315:2321–2327.
-
- Schmidt R, Carson PJ, Jansen RJ. Resurgence of syphilis in the United States: An assessment of contributing factors. Infect Dis (Auckl) 2019; 12:1178633719883282.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical