Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;31(11-12):1686-1696.
doi: 10.1111/jocn.16023. Epub 2021 Sep 2.

Prognostic value of a brief loneliness questionnaire for patients with coronary heart disease: Proposal for a prediction model

Mitti Blakoe  1   2 , Anne Vinggaard Christensen  1 , Pernille Palm  1 , Ida Elisabeth Højskov  3 , Lars Thrysoee  4 , Charlotte Brun Thorup  5 , Britt Borregaard  6   7 , Rikke Elmose Mols  8 , Trine Bernholdt Rasmussen  9 , Selina Kikkenborg Berg  1   2
Affiliations

Prognostic value of a brief loneliness questionnaire for patients with coronary heart disease: Proposal for a prediction model

Mitti Blakoe et al. J Clin Nurs. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Background: In patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), loneliness is associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. No predictive tool is available to detect patients who are influenced by loneliness to a degree that impacts mortality.

Aim: To: (i) propose a prediction model that detects patients influenced by loneliness to a degree that increases one-year all-cause mortality, (ii) evaluate model classification performance of the prediction model, and (iii) investigate potential questionnaire response errors.

Method: A cohort of patients with CHD (n = 7169) responded to a national cross-sectional survey, including two questions on loneliness. Information on cohabitation and follow-up information on one-year all-cause mortality were obtained from national registers. Prediction model development was based on the prognostic values of item responses in the questionnaire on loneliness and of cohabitation, evaluated with Cox-proportional Hazards Ratio (HR). Item responses which significantly predicted one-year mortality were included in the high-risk loneliness (HiRL) prediction model. Sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratio were calculated to evaluate model classification performance. Sources of response errors were evaluated using verbal probing technique in an additional cohort (n = 7). The TRIPOD checklist has been used to ensure transparent reporting.

Results: Two item responses significantly predicted one-year mortality HR = 2.24 (95%CI = 1.24-4.03) and HR = 2.65 (95%CI = 1.32-5.32) and were thus included in the model. Model classification performance showed a likelihood ratio of 1.89. Response error was evaluated as low.

Conclusion: Based on the prognostic value in a loneliness questionnaire, a prediction model suitable to screen patients with CHD for high-risk loneliness was suggested.

Relevance to clinical practice: The HiRL prediction model is a short and easy-to-use screening tool that offers clinical staff to identify patients with CHD who are influenced by loneliness to a degree that impacts mortality. However, further evaluation of model performance and questionnaire validation is recommended before integrating the model into clinical practice.

Keywords: coronary heart disease; loneliness; prognostic research; prognostic tool; screening; social support.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Albus, C., Jordan, J., & Herrmann-Lingen, C. (2004). Screening for psychosocial risk factors in patients with coronary heart disease-recommendations for clinical practice. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, 11(1), 75-79. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjr.0000116823.84388.6c
    1. AUTHOR (2021). Manuscript in review.
    1. Barth, J., Schneider, S., & von Kanel, R. (2010). Lack of social support in the etiology and the prognosis of coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychosomatic Medicine, 72(3), 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181d01611
    1. Beatty, P. C., & Willis, G. B. (2007). Research syntheisis: The practice of cognitive interviewing. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 287-311.
    1. Berg, S. K., Svanholm, J., Lauberg, A., Borregaard, B., Herning, M., Mygind, A., Christensen, A. V., Christensen, A. I., Ekholm, O., Juel, K., & Thrysøe, L. (2014). Patient-reported outcomes at hospital discharge from Heart Centres, a national cross-sectional survey with a register-based follow-up: the DenHeart study protocol. British Medical Journal Open, 4(5), e004709. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004709

LinkOut - more resources