How common are complications following polypropylene mesh, biological xenograft and native tissue surgery for pelvic organ prolapse? A secondary analysis from the PROSPECT trial
- PMID: 34473896
- PMCID: PMC9292877
- DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16897
How common are complications following polypropylene mesh, biological xenograft and native tissue surgery for pelvic organ prolapse? A secondary analysis from the PROSPECT trial
Abstract
Objective: To report complication rates following prolapse surgery using polypropylene mesh inlay, polypropylene mesh kit, biological collagen xenografts and native tissue repairs.
Design: Secondary analysis of the PROSPECT randomised controlled trial and cohort study.
Setting: Thirty-five UK hospitals.
Population: A total of 2632 women undergoing anterior and/or posterior vaginal prolapse repair.
Methods: Event rates were calculated for all complications. Analysis was by treatment received.
Main outcome measures: IUGA/ICS classification of complications and validated patient reported outcome measures.
Results: At baseline, 8.4% of women had 'generic' pain/discomfort; at 2 years following surgery, there was an improvement in all four groups; however, 3.0% of women developed de novo extreme generic pain. At 24 months de novo vaginal tightness occurred in 1.6% of native tissue, 1.2% of biological xenograft, 0.3% of mesh inlay and 3.6% of mesh kit. Severe dyspareunia occurred in 4.8% of native tissue, 4.2% of biological xenograft, 3.4% of mesh inlay repairs and 13.0% of mesh kits. De novo severe dyspareunia occurred in 3.5% of native tissue, 3.5% of biological xenograft, 1.4% of mesh inlays and 4.8% of mesh kits. Complications requiring re-admission to hospital, unrelated to mesh, affected 1 in 24 women; the most common reasons for re-admission were vaginal adhesions, urinary retention, infection and constipation.
Conclusions: This is the first study to address the complications of vaginal mesh used for prolapse surgery alongside data from both native tissue and biological xenograft. It demonstrates the complexity of assessing pain and that all types of prolapse surgery have low surgical morbidity and a low rate of severe complications.
Tweetable abstract: A prospective study of 2362 women undergoing vaginal mesh, xenograft or native tissue repair found low surgical morbidity and low rates of severe complications.
Keywords: Cumberlege report; IUGA/ICS complications classification; dyspareunia; pain; polypropylene mesh; prolapse; surgery; surgical complications.
© 2021 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Comment in
-
Understanding risk: scrutinising PROSPECT.BJOG. 2021 Dec;128(13):2190. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16898. Epub 2021 Sep 20. BJOG. 2021. PMID: 34473907 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
PROSPECT: 4- and 6-year follow-up of a randomised trial of surgery for vaginal prolapse.Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Jan;34(1):67-78. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05308-0. Epub 2022 Aug 26. Int Urogynecol J. 2023. PMID: 36018353 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Mesh inlay, mesh kit or native tissue repair for women having repeat anterior or posterior prolapse surgery: randomised controlled trial (PROSPECT).BJOG. 2020 Jul;127(8):1002-1013. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16197. Epub 2020 Apr 6. BJOG. 2020. PMID: 32141709 Clinical Trial.
-
Mesh, graft, or standard repair for women having primary transvaginal anterior or posterior compartment prolapse surgery: two parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled trials (PROSPECT).Lancet. 2017 Jan 28;389(10067):381-392. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31596-3. Epub 2016 Dec 21. Lancet. 2017. PMID: 28010989 Clinical Trial.
-
Sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review comparing different approaches to pelvic floor repair.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;225(5):475.e1-475.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.042. Epub 2021 Jun 2. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 34087227
-
Diagnosis and management of complications following pelvic organ prolapse surgery using a synthetic mesh: French national guidelines for clinical practice.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024 Mar;294:170-179. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.01.015. Epub 2024 Jan 17. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024. PMID: 38280271 Review.
Cited by
-
Knowledge mapping and visualization analysis of pelvic organ prolapse repair with mesh from 2001 to 2021.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Apr 5;11:1104724. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1104724. eCollection 2023. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023. PMID: 37091336 Free PMC article.
-
Orthogonally woven 3D nanofiber scaffolds promote rapid soft tissue regeneration by enhancing bidirectional cell migration.Bioact Mater. 2024 May 30;39:582-594. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.04.025. eCollection 2024 Sep. Bioact Mater. 2024. PMID: 38883316 Free PMC article.
-
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Reconstruction with the Chitosan-Based Novel Haemostatic Agent in Ovine Model-Preliminary Report.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Mar 28;25(7):3801. doi: 10.3390/ijms25073801. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 38612610 Free PMC article.
-
International urogynecology consultation chapter 3 committee 2; conservative treatment of patient with pelvic organ prolapse: Pelvic floor muscle training.Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Oct;33(10):2633-2667. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05324-0. Epub 2022 Aug 18. Int Urogynecol J. 2022. PMID: 35980443 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transvaginal mesh or grafts or native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 13;3(3):CD012079. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012079.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38477494 Free PMC article.
References
-
- NHS Improvement and NHS England . Vaginal Mesh: High Vigilance Restriction Period: Immediate Action Required, All Cases Should be Postponed If it is Clinically Safe to Do So. London, UK: NHS Improvement and NHS England; 2018. [https://i.emlfiles4.com/cmpdoc/9/7/2/8/1/1/files/47633_mesh‐letter‐to‐ac...]. Accessed 5 August 2020.
-
- Firoozi F, Ingber MS, Moore CK, Vasavada SP, Rackley RR, Goldman HB. Purely transvaginal/perineal management of complications from commercial prolapse kits using a new prostheses/grafts complication classification system. J Urol 2012;187:1674–9. - PubMed
-
- Miklos JR, Chinthakanan O, Moore RD, Mitchell GK, Favors S, Karp DR, et al. The IUGA/ICS classification of synthetic mesh complications in female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: a multicenter study. Int Urogynecol J 2016;27:933–8. - PubMed
-
- First Do No Harm . The Report of the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review. UK: APS Group; 2020. [https://www.immdsreview.org.uk/downloads/IMMDSReview_Web.pdf]. Accessed 5 August 2020.
-
- Glazener C, Breeman S, Elders A, Hemming C, Cooper K, Freeman R, et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of surgical options for the management of anterior and/or posterior vaginal wall prolapse: Two randomised controlled trials within a comprehensive cohort study ‐ results from the PROSPECT study. Health Technol Assess 2016;20:1–452. - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical