Comparison of rapid and conventional methods for investigating of mecA presence in Staphylococcus Species
- PMID: 34475932
- PMCID: PMC8377928
- DOI: 10.12669/pjms.37.5.4274
Comparison of rapid and conventional methods for investigating of mecA presence in Staphylococcus Species
Abstract
Objectives: Taking the determination of mecA gene by polymerized chain reaction (PCR) method as a reference in determining methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus species, we aimed at comparing the reliability levels of disk diffusion, latex agglutination test and chromogenic agar use methods.
Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 228 Staphylococcus strains isolated between January 2020 and December 2020 in Samsun Training and Research Hospital. Disk diffusion, latex agglutination and chromogen agar medium methods were applied along with the polymerized chain reaction (PCR) method.
Results: The mecA gene was detected in 47 of the isolates (20.6%) by the PCR method, and these isolates were accepted as methicillin-resistant. When the PCR result was taken as a reference, the sensitivity of the disk diffusion method became 100%, and specificity became 45.9%; sensitivity of latex agglutination was determined as 80.9%, and specificity as 70.2%; sensitivity of chromogenic agar as 85.1% and its specificity was found to be 95%. Only in S. aureus isolates, the highest sensitivity and specificity rate (100% and 88%, respectively) belonged to chromogenic agar.
Conclusion: Chromogenic agar provides more reliable data for S. aureus isolates, and the combined use of all three methods does not significantly increase reliability.
Keywords: Chromogenic agar; Methicillin Resistance; Staphylococcus; mecA.
Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None.
Figures
References
-
- Haalboom M, Blokhuis-Arkes MHE, Beuk RJ, Meerwaldt R, Klont R, Schijffelen MJ, et al. Culture results from wound biopsy versus wound swab:does it matter for the assessment of wound infection? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25(5):629.e7–629.e12. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2018.08.012. - PubMed
-
- Turhanoglu NM, Koyuncu E, Bayindir-Bilman F. Yara kulturlerinden izole edilen mikroorganizmalar ve antibiyotik dirençleri 2010-2015. Turk Hij Den Biyol Derg. 2018;75(2):183–194. doi:10.5505/TurkHijyen.2018.56338.
-
- Lee AS, de Lencastre H, Garau J, Kluytmans J, Malhotra-Kumar S, Peschel A, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:18033. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2018.33. - PubMed
-
- Monaco M, Pimentel de Araujo F, Cruciani M, Coccia EM, Pantosti A. Worldwide Epidemiology and Antibiotic Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2017;409:21–56. doi:10.1007/82_2016_3. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources