Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar;33(1):230-240.
doi: 10.1007/s00335-021-09907-y. Epub 2021 Sep 2.

Swine models for translational oncological research: an evolving landscape and regulatory considerations

Affiliations
Review

Swine models for translational oncological research: an evolving landscape and regulatory considerations

Adeline N Boettcher et al. Mamm Genome. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Swine biomedical models have been gaining in popularity over the last decade, particularly for applications in oncology research. Swine models for cancer research include pigs that have severe combined immunodeficiency for xenotransplantation studies, genetically modified swine models which are capable of developing tumors in vivo, as well as normal immunocompetent pigs. In recent years, there has been a low success rate for the approval of new oncological therapeutics in clinical trials. The two leading reasons for these failures are either due to toxicity and safety issues or lack of efficacy. As all therapeutics must be tested within animal models prior to clinical testing, there are opportunities to expand the ability to assess efficacy and toxicity profiles within the preclinical testing phases of new therapeutics. Most preclinical in vivo testing is performed in mice, canines, and non-human primates. However, swine models are an alternative large animal model for cancer research with similarity to human size, genetics, and physiology. Additionally, tumorigenesis pathways are similar between human and pigs in that similar driver mutations are required for transformation. Due to their larger size, the development of orthotopic tumors is easier than in smaller rodent models; additionally, porcine models can be harnessed for testing of new interventional devices and radiological/surgical approaches as well. Taken together, swine are a feasible option for preclinical therapeutic and device testing. The goals of this resource are to provide a broad overview on regulatory processes required for new therapeutics and devices for use in the clinic, cross-species differences in oncological therapeutic responses, as well as to provide an overview of swine oncology models that have been developed that could be used for preclinical testing to fulfill regulatory requirements.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adam SJ, Rund LA, Kuzmuk KN, et al. (2007) Genetic induction of tumorigenesis in Swine. Oncogene 26:1038–1045. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209892 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrews AR, Wang Z, Wilkinson RA, et al. (2019) Development of transplantable B-cell lymphomas in the MHC-defined miniature swine model. Cancer Cell Int 19:236. 10.1186/s12935-019-0954-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Basel MT, Balivada S, Beck AP, et al. (2012) Human xenografts are not rejected in a naturally occurring immunodeficient porcine line: a human tumor model in pigs. Biores Open Access 1:63–68. 10.1089/biores.2012.9902 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boas FE, Nurili F, Bendet A, et al. (2020) Induction and characterization of pancreatic cancer in a transgenic pig model. PLoS One 15:e0239391. 10.1371/journal.pone.0239391 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boettcher AN, Cino-Ozuna AG, Solanki Y, et al. (2020a) CD3ε(+) Cells in Pigs With Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Due to Defects in ARTEMIS. Front Immunol 11:510. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00510 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types