Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 3;3(1):59.
doi: 10.1186/s42523-021-00120-5.

Characterization of oral and cloacal microbial communities of wild and rehabilitated loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta)

Affiliations

Characterization of oral and cloacal microbial communities of wild and rehabilitated loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta)

Klara Filek et al. Anim Microbiome. .

Abstract

Background: Microbial communities of wild animals are being increasingly investigated to provide information about the hosts' biology and promote conservation. Loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) are a keystone species in marine ecosystems and are considered vulnerable in the IUCN Red List, which led to growing efforts in sea turtle conservation by rescue centers around the world. Understanding the microbial communities of sea turtles in the wild and how affected they are by captivity, is one of the stepping stones in improving the conservation efforts. Describing oral and cloacal microbiota of wild animals could shed light on the previously unknown aspects of sea turtle holobiont biology, ecology, and contribute to best practices for husbandry conditions.

Results: We describe the oral and cloacal microbiota of Mediterranean loggerhead sea turtles by 16S rRNA gene sequencing to compare the microbial communities of wild versus turtles in, or after, rehabilitation at the Adriatic Sea rescue centers and clinics. Our results show that the oral microbiota is more sensitive to environmental shifts than the cloacal microbiota, and that it does retain a portion of microbial taxa regardless of the shift from the wild and into rehabilitation. Additionally, Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes dominated oral and cloacal microbiota, while Kiritimatiellaeota were abundant in cloacal samples. Unclassified reads were abundant in the aforementioned groups, which indicates high incidence of yet undiscovered bacteria of the marine reptile microbial communities.

Conclusions: We provide the first insights into the oral microbial communities of wild and rehabilitated loggerhead sea turtles, and establish a framework for quick and non-invasive sampling of oral and cloacal microbial communities, useful for the expansion of the sample collection in wild loggerhead sea turtles. Finally, our investigation of effects of captivity on the gut-associated microbial community provides a baseline for studying the impact of husbandry conditions on turtles' health and survival upon their return to the wild.

Keywords: Adriatic Sea; Bacterial diversity; Conservation; Microbiota; Rehabilitation; Reptile.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Alpha diversity (Shannon index, observed ASVs, Faith’s Phylogenetic Diversity) of loggerhead cloacal (purple), oral (yellow), and tank water (blue) samples. Filled diamond indicates sample median with lines extending to the upper and lower quartile of sample distribution
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparison of microbial diversity in loggerhead cloacal, oral and tank water samples a principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot of Bray–Curtis distances and b principal component analysis (PCA) biplot of robust Aitchison distances with loadings as individual highly ranked ASVs
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparison of microbial diversity in loggerhead cloacal, oral and tank water samples. Principal component analysis (PCoA) plot of a Unweighted Unifrac and b Weighted Unifrac
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Natural log-ratios (plotted by QURRO) of loggerhead samples’ top and bottom 5%, 10%, and 20% of feature loadings on rPC1 and rPC2 of Robust Aitchison PCA biplot feature loadings by sampling site and period: CB, cloacal before; CR, cloacal rehabilitated; OB, oral before; OR, oral rehabilitated; W, tank water
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Relative abundances (%) of bacterial phyla present (> 1% on average per sampling site) in loggerhead cloacal, oral and tank water samples. Turtle ID suffix indicates the sampling site and period (before or during/after rehabilitation) as follows: CB, cloacal before; CR, cloacal rehabilitated; OB, oral before; OR, oral rehabilitated; W, tank water

References

    1. McFall-Ngai M, Hadfield MG, Bosch TC, Carey HV, Domazet-Lošo T, Douglas AE, et al. Animals in a bacterial world, a new imperative for the life sciences. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110:3229–3236. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218525110. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ley RE, Lozupone CA, Hamady M, Knight R, Gordon JI. Worlds within worlds: evolution of the vertebrate gut microbiota. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6:776–788. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1978. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gilbert J, Blaser MJ, Caporaso GJ, Jansson J, Lynch SV, Knight R. Current understanding of the human microbiome. Nat Med. 2018;24:392–400. doi: 10.1038/nm.4517. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenberg E, Zilber-Rosenberg I. The hologenome concept of evolution after 10 years. Microbiome. 2018;6:78. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0457-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moran NA, Sloan DB. The hologenome concept: Helpful or hollow? PLoS Biol. 2015;13:e1002311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002311. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources