Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 3;11(1):17671.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97249-9.

Genetic profiles of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma in Japanese patients

Affiliations

Genetic profiles of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma in Japanese patients

Mamoru Tokunaga et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The genetic characteristics of Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in the Japanese population is unclear. This study aims to investigate the genetic characteristics from nondysplastic BE (NDBE) to early EAC in Japan. Clinical information was collected. Moreover, the genetic profile of NDBE without concurrent dysplasia, early EAC, and surrounding BE were also investigated using endoscopic biopsy samples and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens from Japanese patients by targeted next-generation sequencing. Immunohistochemical staining for p53 was also performed for EAC lesions. Targeted NGS was performed for 33 cases with 77 specimens. No significant difference exists in the NDBE group between the number of putative drivers per lesion in the short-segment Barrett's esophagus (SSBE) and long-segment Barrett's esophagus (LSBE) [0 (range, 0-1) vs. 0 (range, 0-1). p = 1.00]. TP53 putative drivers were found in two patients (16.7%) with nondysplastic SSBE. TP53 was the majority of putative drivers in both BE adjacent to EAC and EAC, accounting for 66.7% and 66.7%, respectively. More putative drivers per lesion were found in the EAC than in the NDBE group [1 (range, 0-3) vs. 0 (range, 0-1). p < 0.01]. The genetic variants of TP53 in the Japanese early EAC were similar to those in western countries. However, TP53 putative drivers were detected even in Japanese patients with nondysplastic SSBE. This is significant because such nondysplastic SSBE might have higher risk of progressing to high-grade dysplasia or EAC. The risks of progression may not be underestimated and appropriate follow-ups may be necessary even in patients with SSBE.Trial registration: This study was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000034247).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative case of targeted biopsy for nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus (C4M6, long-segment Barrett’s esophagus case 8). Biopsy specimens were taken from the most elongated part of the Barrett’s esophagus to separate from the epithelium of the stomach. The yellow circle shows the area where the biopsy was taken.
Figure 2
Figure 2
List of 69 significant mutated genes included in the panel. Each box shows each gene included in the panel.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Study flow. EAC esophageal adenocarcinoma, EMR-C endoscopic mucosal resection with cap, ESD endoscopic submucosal dissection, LSBE long-segment Barrett’s esophagus, SSBE short-segment Barrett’s esophagus.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Experimental results for p53 staining. (A) Overexpression-type mutation pattern. (B) Null cell-type mutation pattern. (C) Wild-type pattern. Scale bar, 100 µm. HE hematoxylin and eosin.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Gene plot showing putative drivers in each sample. Putative drivers were judged with OncoKB (https://www.oncokb.org/). Yellow boxes represent missense mutations. Red boxes represent nonsense mutations. Each Box without numbers represents a single mutation. The numbers in the boxes indicate the number of mutations. BE Barrett’s esophagus, EAC esophageal adenocarcinoma, LSBE long-segment Barrett’s esophagus, SSBE short-segment Barrett’s esophagus.

References

    1. Spechler SJ, Goyal RK. Barrett’s esophagus. N. Engl. J. Med. 1986;315:362–371. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198608073150605. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barrett NR. The lower esophagus lined by columnar epithelium. Surgery. 1957;41:881–894. - PubMed
    1. Shaheen N, Ransohoff D. Gastroesophageal reflux, Barrett esophagus, and esophageal cancer, scientific review. JAMA. 2002;287:1972–1981. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.15.1972. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gavin AT, Francisci S, Foschi R, et al. Oesophageal cancer survival in Europe, a EUROCARE-4 study. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;36:505–512. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.07.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pohl H, Welch HG. The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2005;97:142–146. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji024. - DOI - PubMed

Supplementary concepts