Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct 21;81(20):4116-4136.
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.07.036. Epub 2021 Sep 3.

Recent technical advances in the study of nucleic acid modifications

Affiliations
Review

Recent technical advances in the study of nucleic acid modifications

Michael C Owens et al. Mol Cell. .

Abstract

Enzyme-mediated chemical modifications of nucleic acids are indispensable regulators of gene expression. Our understanding of the biochemistry and biological significance of these modifications has largely been driven by an ever-evolving landscape of technologies that enable accurate detection, mapping, and manipulation of these marks. Here we provide a summary of recent technical advances in the study of nucleic acid modifications with a focus on techniques that allow accurate detection and mapping of these modifications. For each modification discussed (N6-methyladenosine, 5-methylcytidine, inosine, pseudouridine, and N4-acetylcytidine), we begin by introducing the "gold standard" technique for its mapping and detection, followed by a discussion of techniques developed to address any shortcomings of the gold standard. By highlighting the commonalities and differences of these techniques, we hope to provide a perspective on the current state of the field and to lay out a guideline for development of future technologies.

Keywords: 5-methylcytidine; DNA modification; N(4)-acetylcytidine; N(6)-methyladenosine; RNA modification; inosine; pseudouridine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Biogenesis reactions for each modification discussed
(A) Generation of m6A and inosine from adenosine. (B) Generation of 5-methylcytidine from cytidine and oxidation reactions of 5-methylcytidine. (C) Generation of ψ from uridine. (D) Generation of ac4C from cytidine.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Chemical and biochemical reactions for each technique discussed
(A) (Bio)chemical modifications used in the study of m6A: biochemical modification of m6A to hm6A by the enzyme FTO and subsequent chemical modification to d6A by DTT and biochemical modification of A to a6A by writer enzymes and subsequent chemical modification to Cyc-A by iodination. (B) (Bio)chemical modifications used in the study of 5mC/m5C: chemical deamination of C to dU by bisulfite, chemical oxidation of 5hmC to 5fC by KRuO4 and biochemical modification of 5hmC to 5ghmc by the enzyme β-GT, biochemical deamination of 5mC to T by APOBEC, chemical modification of 5caC to dihydrouridine (DHU) by pyridine borane, and structure of 5-azacytidine. (C) Chemical modifications used in the study of inosine: chemical modification of inosine to ce1I by acrylonitrile and chemical modification of guanosine with glyoxal and further modification with borate. (D) Chemical modifications used in the study of ψ: chemical modification of ψ with CMCT and chemical cleavage of uridine with hydrazine. (E) Chemical modification used in the study of ac4C: chemical reduction of ac4C by NaCNBH3.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Workflows/principles and drawbacks of the gold standard techniques for each modification
(A) Workflow of meRIP/m6A-IP-seq. (B) Principle of bisulfite conversion. (C) Principle of RNA/DNA differences. (D) Drawbacks of meRIP/m6A-IP-seq. (E) Drawbacks of bisulfite conversion. (F) Drawback of RNA/DNA differences.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Underlying principles relevant for several techniques
(A) Enrichment of modified RNA by IP. (B) Use of reader proteins to target or enrich for modified RNA. Active moieties can be fused to the reader protein to act as an epitope tag for enrichment or to further modify the RNA. (C) Differential enzyme activity/chemical reactivity as a result of modification. (D) Induction of RT stops or mutations by modified bases. (E) Covalent trapping of RNA-modifying enzymes. (F) Further chemical modification of RNA to alter base-pairing, to alter susceptibility to further modification, or to protect the RNA from digestion.

References

    1. Akichika S, Hirano S, Shichino Y, Suzuki T, Nishimasu H, Ishitani R, Sugita A, Hirose Y, Iwasaki S, Nureki O, and Suzuki T (2019). Cap-specific terminal N 6-methylation of RNA by an RNA polymerase II-associated methyltransferase. Science 363, eaav0080. - PubMed
    1. Amort T, Rieder D, Wille A, Khokhlova-Cubberley D, Riml C, Trixl L, Jia X-Y, Micura R, and Lusser A (2017). Distinct 5-methylcytosine profiles in poly(A) RNA from mouse embryonic stem cells and brain. Genome Biol. 18, 1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arango D, Sturgill D, Alhusaini N, Dillman AA, Sweet TJ, Hanson G, Hosogane M, Sinclair WR, Nanan KK, Mandler MD, et al. (2018). Acetylation of Cytidine in mRNA Promotes Translation Efficiency. Cell 175, 1872–1886.e24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bachellerie JP, Cavaillé J, and Hüttenhofer A (2002). The expanding snoRNA world. Biochimie 84, 775–790. - PubMed
    1. Bahn JH, Lee J-H, Li G, Greer C, Peng G, and Xiao X (2012). Accurate identification of A-to-I RNA editing in human by transcriptome sequencing. Genome Res. 22, 142–150. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources