Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Dec;18(12):2128-2136.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.08.027. Epub 2021 Sep 1.

Diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer to detect left atrial thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer to detect left atrial thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Carlos Diaz-Arocutipa et al. Heart Rhythm. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Background: There is conflicting evidence about the use of biomarkers to diagnose left atrial thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer to detect left atrial thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Methods: We searched 4 electronic databases from inception to December 16, 2020. The reference standard was left atrial thrombus detected by transesophageal echocardiography. Study quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. We used a bivariate model to calculate the pooled sensitivity and specificity with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The optimal cutoff and predictive values were also estimated.

Results: Eleven cross-sectional studies involving 4380 patients were included. The median prevalence of left atrial thrombus was 12%. In 7 studies, the pooled sensitivity of D-dimer at 500 ng/mL was 50% (95% CI 26%-74%) and the pooled specificity was 88% (95% CI 76%-95%). The pooled sensitivity of age-adjusted D-dimer was 36% (95% CI 14%-66%) and the pooled specificity was 99% (95% CI 96%-99%) in 2 studies. The optimal cutoff of D-dimer was 390 ng/mL in 10 studies with a pooled sensitivity of 68% (95% CI 44%-85%) and a pooled specificity of 73% (95% CI 54%-86%). The positive and negative predictive values were 21.8% and 95.4%, respectively. The risk of bias was low or unclear for all domains. Concerns about applicability were low for almost all studies.

Conclusion: Our meta-analysis suggests that D-dimer has the potential to be useful to rule out left atrial thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; D-dimer; Diagnostic accuracy; Left atrial thrombus; Meta-analysis; Transesophageal echocardiography.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources