Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 4;21(1):602.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04075-y.

Evaluation of the Hindi version of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among pregnant and postnatal women in urban India

Affiliations

Evaluation of the Hindi version of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among pregnant and postnatal women in urban India

Sushmita Das et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Valid and reliable measures such as London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP) are imperative for understanding fertility-related behaviors and estimating unintended pregnancy. The aim of this study was to validate the LMUP in the Hindi language for a wider reach in India.

Methods: An interviewer administered version of the LMUP was translated and pretested in Hindi. The LMUP was field tested with married women in the reproductive age group across forty informal settlements in Mumbai in the post intervention census of a cluster randomized control trial to improve the health of women and children. Analyses involved the full sample and sub-groups according to time-from-conception. Reliability (internal consistency) was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, inter-item correlations, and item-rest correlations. Construct validity was assessed by hypothesis testing and confirmatory factor analysis.

Results: 4991 women were included in the study (1180 were pregnant, 2126 in their first- and 1685 in their second postnatal year). LMUP item completion rates were 100 % and the full range of LMUP scores was captured. Reliability: the scale was internally consistent (Cronbach's α = 0.84), inter-item correlations were positive, and item-rest correlations were above 0.2 for all items except item six (0.07). Construct validity: hypotheses were met, and confirmatory factor analysis showed that a one-factor model was a good fit for the data, confirming unidimensional measurement. The sub-group analysis (by pregnant, first-, and second postnatal year) showed that the psychometric properties of the LMUP were similar across the groups. In terms of LMUP scores, the women in the postnatal groups were very slightly, but significantly, more likely to have an LMUP score of 10 + compared to pregnant women; the difference between the first and second postnatal year was not significant.

Conclusions: The Hindi LMUP is valid and reliable measure of pregnancy intention that may be used in India.

Trial registration: This study is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN56183183, and Clinical Trials Registry of India, number CTRI/2012/09/003004.

Keywords: India; Measure; Pregnancy intention; Psychometric; Unplanned; Validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Frequencies of LMUP scores among women who were pregnant or within two years postpartum
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Box plot showing median and inter-quartile range of LMUP scores by women’s age group
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Box plot showing median and inter-quartile range of LMUP score by number of living children
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Box plot showing median and inter-quartile range of LMUP score by pregnancy and postnatal status

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Guttmacher Institute. ADDING IT UP: Investing in Contraception and Maternal and Newborn Health, 2017. New York; 2017.
    1. Klima CS. Unintended pregnancy consequences and solutions for a worldwide problem. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery. 1998;43(6):483–91. doi: 10.1016/S0091-2182(98)00063-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tsui AO, McDonald-Mosley R, Burke AE. Family planning and the burden of unintended pregnancies. Vol. 32, Epidemiologic Reviews. 2010. p. 152–74. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Finer LB, Lindberg LD, Desai S. A prospective measure of unintended pregnancy in the United States. Contraception. 2018;98(6):522–7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.05.012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rahman M, Nasrin SO, Rahman M, Rahman A, Mostofa G, Jesmin SS, et al. Maternal pregnancy intention and its association with low birthweight and pregnancy complications in Bangladesh: Findings from a hospital-based study. International Health. 2019;11(6):447–54. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihz010. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources