Antenatal counselling for prospective parents whose fetus has a neurological anomaly: part 2, risks of adverse outcome in common anomalies
- PMID: 34482539
- DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.15043
Antenatal counselling for prospective parents whose fetus has a neurological anomaly: part 2, risks of adverse outcome in common anomalies
Abstract
After diagnosis of a fetal neurological anomaly, prospective parents want to know the best and worst-case scenarios and an estimation of the risk to their infant of having an atypical developmental outcome. The literature on developmental outcomes for fetal neurological anomalies is poor: studies are characterized by retrospective design, small sample size, often no standardized assessment of development, and differing definitions of anomalies. This review provides an aide-memoir on the risks of adverse neurodevelopmental outcome for ventriculomegaly, cortical anomalies, microcephaly, macrocephaly, agenesis of the corpus callosum, posterior fossa anomalies, and myelomeningocele, to assist healthcare professionals in counselling. The data in this review should be used alongside recommendations on counselling and service design described in part 1 to provide antenatal counselling.
© 2021 Mac Keith Press.
Comment in
-
The way forward in medical and ethical antenatal counselling for neurological anomalies.Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022 Jan;64(1):6. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15079. Epub 2021 Oct 5. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022. PMID: 34608997 No abstract available.
-
Antenatal counselling families whose fetus has a neurological anomaly: one parent's reflections.Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022 Jan;64(1):135. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15087. Epub 2021 Oct 24. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022. PMID: 34693517 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Hart AR, Vollmer B, Howe D, et al. Antenatal counselling for prospective parents whose fetus has a neurological anomaly: part 1, experiences and recommendations for service design. Dev Med Child Neurol 2021 (Forthcoming). https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15022
-
- Wapner RJ, Martin CL, Levy B, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N Eng J Med 2012; 367: 2175-84.
-
- Grande M, Jansen FAR, Blumenfeld YJ, et al. Genomic microarray in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency and normal karyotype: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 650-8.
-
- Hillman SC, McMullan DJ, Hall G, et al. Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 610-20.
-
- Bornstein E, Berger S, Cheung SW, et al. Universal prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis: additive value and clinical dilemmas in fetuses with a normal karyotype. Am J Perinatol 2017; 34: 340-8.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
