Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 13:12:725832.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725832. eCollection 2021.

Early Environmental and Biological Influences on Preschool Motor Skills: Implications for Early Childhood Care and Education

Affiliations

Early Environmental and Biological Influences on Preschool Motor Skills: Implications for Early Childhood Care and Education

Elena Escolano-Pérez et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Early motor skills underpin the more complex and specialized movements required for physical activity. Therefore, the design of interventions that enhance higher levels of early motor skills may encourage subsequent participation in physical activity. To do so, it is necessary to determine the influence of certain factors (some of which appear very early) on early motor skills. The objective of this study was to examine the influence of some very early environmental variables (delivery mode, feeding type during the first 4 months of life) and some biological variables (sex and age in months) on preschool motor skills, considered both globally and specifically. The sample was composed by 43 preschool students aged 5-6 years. The participant's parents completed an ad hoc questionnaire, reporting on delivery mode, feeding type, sex, and age in months. The children's motor skills were assessed using observational methodology in the school setting, while the children participated in their regular motor skills sessions. A Nomothetic/Punctual/Multidimensional observational design was used. Results revealed that certain preschool motor skills were specifically influenced by delivery mode, feeding type, sex, and age. Children born by vaginal delivery showed higher scores than children born via C-section in throwing (p = 0.000; d = 0.63); total control of objects (p = 0.004; d = 0.97); total gross motor skills (p = 0.005; d = 0.95); and total motor skills (p = 0.002; d = 1.04). Children who were exclusively breastfed outperformed those who were formula-fed in throwing (p = 0.016; d = 0.75); visual-motor integration (p = 0.005; d = 0.94); total control of objects (p = 0.002; d = 1.02); total gross motor skills (p = 0.023; d = 0.82); and total motor skills (p = 0.042; d = 0.74). Boys outperformed girls in throwing (p = 0.041; d = 0.74) and total control of objects (p = 0.024; d = 0.63); while the opposite occurred in static balance (p = 0.000; d = 1.2); visual-motor coordination (p = 0.020; d = 0.79); and total fine motor skills (p = 0.032; d = 0.72). Older children (aged 69-74 months) obtained higher scores than younger ones (aged 63-68 months) in dynamic balance (p = 0.030; d = 0.66); visual-motor integration (p = 0.034; d = 0.63); and total balance (p = 0.013; d = 0.75). Implications for early childhood care and education are discussed since this is a critical period for motor skill development and learning.

Keywords: delivery mode; early childhood; early childhood care and education; feeding type; motor skills; observational methodology; relative age effect; sex.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anguera M. T. (2001). Cómo apresar las competencias del bebé mediante una aplicación de la metodología observacional [How to capture the baby's skills through an application of observational methodology]. Contextos Educativos 4, 13–34. 10.18172/con.484 - DOI
    1. Anguera M. T. (2003). Observational methods (General), in Encyclopedia of Psychological Assessment, Vol 2, ed R. Fernández Ballesteros (London: Sage; ), 632–637.
    1. Anguera M. T., Blanco-Villaseñor A., Jonsson G. K., Losada J. L., Portell M. (2020a). Editorial: best practice approaches for mixed methods research in psychological science. Front. Psychol. 11:590131. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.590131 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anguera M. T., Blanco-Villaseñor A., Losada J. L., Portell M. (2018b). Pautas para elaborar trabajos que utilizan la metodología observacional [Guidelines for developing studies that use the observational methodology]. Anu. Psicol. 48, 9–17. 10.1016/j.anpsic.2018.02.001 - DOI
    1. Anguera M. T., Blanco-Villaseñor A., Losada J. L., Sánchez-Algarra P. (2020b). Integración de elementos cualitativos y cuantitativos en metodología observacional [Integration of qualitative and quantitative elements in observational methodology]. Ámbitos. Rev. Int. Comun. 49, 49–70. 10.12795/Ambitos.2020.i49.04 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources