Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 16:12:696536.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.696536. eCollection 2021.

A Novel Single Cell RNA-seq Analysis of Non-Myeloid Circulating Cells in Late Sepsis

Affiliations

A Novel Single Cell RNA-seq Analysis of Non-Myeloid Circulating Cells in Late Sepsis

Dijoia B Darden et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Background: With the successful implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, post-sepsis in-hospital mortality to sepsis continues to decrease. Those who acutely survive surgical sepsis will either rapidly recover or develop a chronic critical illness (CCI). CCI is associated with adverse long-term outcomes and 1-year mortality. Although the pathobiology of CCI remains undefined, emerging evidence suggests a post-sepsis state of pathologic myeloid activation, inducing suboptimal lymphopoiesis and erythropoiesis, as well as downstream leukocyte dysfunction. Our goal was to use single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to perform a detailed transcriptomic analysis of lymphoid-derived leukocytes to better understand the pathology of late sepsis.

Methods: A mixture of whole blood myeloid-enriched and Ficoll-enriched peripheral blood mononuclear cells from four late septic patients (post-sepsis day 14-21) and five healthy subjects underwent Cellular Indexing of Transcriptomes and Epitopes by Sequencing (CITE-seq).

Results: We identified unique transcriptomic patterns for multiple circulating immune cell subtypes, including B- and CD4+, CD8+, activated CD4+ and activated CD8+ T-lymphocytes, as well as natural killer (NK), NKT, and plasmacytoid dendritic cells in late sepsis patients. Analysis demonstrated that the circulating lymphoid cells maintained a transcriptome reflecting immunosuppression and low-grade inflammation. We also identified transcriptomic differences between patients with bacterial versus fungal sepsis, such as greater expression of cytotoxic genes among CD8+ T-lymphocytes in late bacterial sepsis.

Conclusion: Circulating non-myeloid cells display a unique transcriptomic pattern late after sepsis. Non-myeloid leukocytes in particular reveal a host endotype of inflammation, immunosuppression, and dysfunction, suggesting a role for precision medicine-guided immunomodulatory therapy.

Keywords: chronic critical illness; immune cells; lymphocytes; scRNA-seq; sepsis; transcriptome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
scRNA-seq analysis at 14-21 days post-sepsis versus healthy control. Cells depicted are from all subjects in the study, in each corresponding group (sepsis n=4, healthy n=5). Using Seurat’s method of integrating data across conditions/batches, the integration allows for joint clustering and to identify shared (or possibly unshared) cell clusters. Cells are visualized on uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) plots colored by cell types. (A) UMAP representation of cell clusters identified in healthy patients versus late sepsis. (B) Annotation of T-lymphocyte subsets was performed manually using expression of CD3D, CD4, CD8A, CCL5, CCR7, FOXP3, GNLY, IL2RA, IL7R, NCAM1 and NKG7. (C) UMAP representation of T-cell subset clusters from manual annotation identified in healthy patients versus late sepsis in three dimensions. (E-MDSC, early myeloid derived suppressor cell; G-MDSC, granulocytic myeloid derived suppressor cell; M-MDSC, monocytic myeloid derived suppressor cell; pDC, plasmacytoid dendritic cells).

References

    1. Prescott HC, Angus DC. Enhancing Recovery From Sepsis: A Review. JAMA (2018) 319(1):62–75. 10.1001/jama.2017.17687 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rhee C, Dantes R, Epstein L, Murphy DJ, Seymour CW, Iwashyna TJ, et al. . Incidence and Trends of Sepsis in US Hospitals Using Clinical vs Claims Data, 2009-2014. JAMA (2017) 318(13):1241–9. 10.1001/jama.2017.13836 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brakenridge SC, Efron PA, Cox MC, Stortz JA, Hawkins RB, Ghita G, et al. . Current Epidemiology of Surgical Sepsis: Discordance Between Inpatient Mortality and 1-Year Outcomes. Ann Surg (2019) 270(3):502–10. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003458 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gardner AK, Ghita GL, Wang Z, Ozrazgat-Baslanti T, Raymond SL, Mankowski RT, et al. . The Development of Chronic Critical Illness Determines Physical Function, Quality of Life, and Long-Term Survival Among Early Survivors of Sepsis in Surgical ICUs. Crit Care Med (2019) 47(4):566–73. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003655 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stortz JA, Mira JC, Raymond SL, Loftus TJ, Ozrazgat-Baslanti T, Wang Z, et al. . Benchmarking Clinical Outcomes and the Immunocatabolic Phenotype of Chronic Critical Illness After Sepsis in Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg (2018) 84(2):342–9. 10.1097/TA.0000000000001758 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms