Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021;41(5):62.
doi: 10.1007/s13593-021-00712-0. Epub 2021 Aug 31.

Transformation of coffee-growing landscapes across Latin America. A review

Affiliations
Review

Transformation of coffee-growing landscapes across Latin America. A review

Celia A Harvey et al. Agron Sustain Dev. 2021.

Abstract

In Latin America, the cultivation of Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) plays a critical role in rural livelihoods, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable development. Over the last 20 years, coffee farms and landscapes across the region have undergone rapid and profound biophysical changes in response to low coffee prices, changing climatic conditions, severe plant pathogen outbreaks, and other drivers. Although these biophysical transformations are pervasive and affect millions of rural livelihoods, there is limited information on the types, location, and extent of landscape changes and their socioeconomic and ecological consequences. Here we review the state of knowledge on the ongoing biophysical changes in coffee-growing regions, explore the potential socioeconomic and ecological impacts of these changes, and highlight key research gaps. We identify seven major land-use trends which are affecting the sustainability of coffee-growing regions across Latin America in different ways. These trends include (1) the widespread shift to disease-resistant cultivars, (2) the conventional intensification of coffee management with greater planting densities, greater use of agrochemicals and less shade, (3) the conversion of coffee to other agricultural land uses, (4) the introduction of Robusta coffee (Coffea canephora) into areas not previously cultivated with coffee, (5) the expansion of coffee into forested areas, (6) the urbanization of coffee landscapes, and (7) the increase in the area of coffee produced under voluntary sustainability standards. Our review highlights the incomplete and scattered information on the drivers, patterns, and outcomes of biophysical changes in coffee landscapes, and lays out a detailed research agenda to address these research gaps and elucidate the effects of different landscape trajectories on rural livelihoods, biodiversity conservation, and other aspects of sustainable development. A better understanding of the drivers, patterns, and consequences of changes in coffee landscapes is vital for informing the design of policies, programs, and incentives for sustainable coffee production.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13593-021-00712-0.

Keywords: Agroforestry systems; Certification; Coffea arabica; Coffea canephora; Coffee leaf rust; Deforestation; Intensification; Land-use change.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Photographs illustrating the current land use and ongoing transformation of coffee farms and landscapes across Latin America: a) a typical smallholder coffee farm in Yoro, Honduras, where coffee is grown in small plots under a sparse canopy of bananas and shade trees; b) a landscape dominated by intensive coffee production with highly managed shade in Los Santos, Costa Rica; c) coffee leaf rust, a disease which has caused widespread damage to coffee plantations and led farmers to replace traditional coffee varieties with disease-resistant varieties; d) an example of an intensified coffee farm in the lowlands of El Salvador, with coffee grown in open sun and with irrigation; e) a landscape in Colombia’s coffee zone where some coffee fields have been converted to pasture and other agricultural land uses; and f) a landscape in Risaralda, Colombia, where coffee agroforests and forests have been cleared to establish new coffee. Photo credits: Milagro Sandoval (a), Jose Mario Cardenas (b), Alyssa Pritts (c), Jacques Avelino (d), ©2009CIAT/Neil Palmer (e), Inge Armbrecht (f).

References

    1. Aceves Navarro LA, Rivera Hernández B, López Castañeda A, Palma López DJ, González Mancillas R, Juárez López JF. Áreas potenciales y vulnerabilidad del cultivo de café tipo robusta (Coffea canephora P.) al cambio climático en el estado de Tabasco, México. Nova Scientia. 2018;10(20):369–396. doi: 10.21640/ns.v10i20.1379. - DOI
    1. Amico A, Paz-Pellat F. Del papel a la acción en la mitigación y adaptación al cambio climático: la roya del cafeto en Chiapas. Madera y bosques. 2018;24(spe):e2401914. doi: 10.21829/myb.2018.2401914. - DOI
    1. Amico AM, Ituarte-Lima C, Elmqvist T. Learning from social–ecological crisis for legal resilience building: multi-scale dynamics in the coffee rust epidemic. Sustain Sci. 2020;15:485–450. doi: 10.1007/s11625-019-00703-x. - DOI
    1. Anacafé (2019) Café de Guatemala en cifras: datos actividad cafetalera nacional 2018-2019. https://www.anacafe.org/uploads/file/cd2552c54b3a4616b0e82ae14c7db79a/Gu.... Accessed 20 Oct 2020
    1. Anderzén J, Luna AG, Luna-González DV, Merrill SC, Caswell M, Méndez VE, Jonapá RH. Effects of on-farm diversification strategies on smallholder coffee farmer food security and income sufficiency in Chiapas, Mexico. J of Rural Stud. 2020;77:33–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.001. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources