Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep;13(3):287-292.
doi: 10.4055/cios20317. Epub 2021 Aug 17.

Biomaterials Used for Suture Anchors in Orthopedic Surgery

Affiliations
Review

Biomaterials Used for Suture Anchors in Orthopedic Surgery

Chul-Hyun Cho et al. Clin Orthop Surg. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Suture anchors are broadly used for attaching soft tissue (e.g., tendons, ligaments, and meniscus) to the bone and have become essential devices in sports medicine and during arthroscopic surgery. As the usage of suture anchors has increased, various material-specific advantages and challenges have been reported. As a result, suture anchors are continually changing to become safer and more efficient. In this ever-changing environment, it is clinically essential for the surgeon to understand the key characteristics of existing anchors sufficiently. This paper aims to summarize the current concepts on the characteristics of available suture anchors.

Keywords: Arthroscopy; Biocompatible materials; Knee; Shoulder; Sports medicine; Suture anchor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Metallic suture anchor: Super Revo FT, titanium (ConMed Linvatec, Largo, FL, USA).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Biostable suture anchors. (A) ReelX STT (Stryker, San Jose, CA, USA). (B) PopLok (ConMed Linvatec, Largo, FL, USA). (C) FootPrint (Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA, USA).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Biocomposite suture anchors. (A) BioComposite Corkscrew FT, 15% beta-tricalcium phosphate and 85% poly-L-lactic acid (Arthrex, Naples, PL, USA). (B) Genesis CrossFT, 23% beta-tricalcium phosphate and 77% poly-lactic acid (ConMed Linvatec, Largo, FL, USA).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Biocomposite suture anchor: Healicoil Regenesorb (Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA, USA).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. All-soft suture anchors. (A) Q-Fix (Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA, USA). (B) Suturefix (Smith & Nephew). (C) Iconix (Stryker Endoscopy, San Jose, CA, USA). (D) JuggerKnot (Biomet Sports Medicine, Warsaw, IN, USA). (E) Y-Knot (ConMed Linvatec, Largo, FL, USA).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Visscher LE, Jeffery C, Gilmour T, Anderson L, Couzens G. The history of suture anchors in orthopaedic surgery. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2019;61:70–78. - PubMed
    1. Ozbaydar M, Elhassan B, Warner JJ. The use of anchors in shoulder surgery: a shift from metallic to bioabsorbable anchors. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(10):1124–1126. - PubMed
    1. Barber FA. Biodegradable materials: anchors and interference screws. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2015;23(3):112–117. - PubMed
    1. Mueller MB, Fredrich HH, Steinhauser E, Schreiber U, Arians A, Imhoff AB. Biomechanical evaluation of different suture anchors for the stabilization of anterior labrum lesions. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(5):611–619. - PubMed
    1. Suchenski M, McCarthy MB, Chowaniec D, et al. Material properties and composition of soft-tissue fixation. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(6):821–831. - PubMed

Substances