Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Aug 16:8:680186.
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.680186. eCollection 2021.

Facial Cartilaginous Reconstruction-A Historical Perspective, State-of-the-Art, and Future Directions

Affiliations
Review

Facial Cartilaginous Reconstruction-A Historical Perspective, State-of-the-Art, and Future Directions

Zita M Jessop et al. Front Surg. .

Abstract

Importance: Reconstruction of facial deformity poses a significant surgical challenge due to the psychological, functional, and aesthetic importance of this anatomical area. There is a need to provide not only an excellent colour and contour match for skin defects, but also a durable cartilaginous structural replacement for nasal or auricular defects. The purpose of this review is to describe the history of, and state-of-the-art techniques within, facial cartilaginous surgery, whilst highlighting recent advances and future directions for this continually advancing specialty. Observations: Limitations of synthetic implants for nasal and auricular reconstruction, such as silicone and porous polyethylene, have meant that autologous cartilage tissue for such cases remains the current gold standard. Similarly, tissue engineering approaches using unrelated cells and synthetic scaffolds have shown limited in vivo success. There is increasing recognition that both the intrinsic and extrinsic microenvironment are important for tissue engineering and synthetic scaffolds fail to provide the necessary cues for cartilage matrix secretion. Conclusions and Relevance: We discuss the first-in-man studies in the context of biomimetic and developmental approaches to engineering durable cartilage for clinical translation. Implementation of engineered autologous tissue into clinical practise could eliminate donor site morbidity and represent the next phase of the facial reconstruction evolution.

Keywords: cartilage; facial reconstruction; plastic and reconstructive surgery; regenerative medicine; tissue engineering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
History of cartilaginous based facial reconstruction.

References

    1. Changing Faces. Disfigurement in the UK. (2017). Available online at: https://www.changingfaces.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/disfiguremen... (accessed March 1, 2021).
    1. Hurvitz KA, Kobayashi M, Evans GRD. Current options in head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. (2006) 118:122e−33e. 10.1097/01.prs.0000237094.58891.fb - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jiamei D, Jiake C, Hongxing Z, Wanhou G, Yan W, Gaifen L. An investigation of psychological profiles and risk factors in congenital microtia patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. (2008) 61(Suppl. 1):S37–S43. 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.09.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gibson JAG Ackling E Bisson JI Dobbs TD Whitaker IS . The association of affective disorders and facial scarring: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. (2018) 239:1–10. 10.1016/j.jad.2018.06.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johnson TM, Ratner D, Nelson BR. Soft tissue reconstruction with skin grafting. J Am Acad Dermatol. (1992) 27(2 Pt 1):151–65. 10.1016/0190-9622(92)70164-B - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources