Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;5(3):386-395.
doi: 10.1007/s41465-020-00196-y. Epub 2020 Nov 27.

Multisensory Facilitation of Working Memory Training

Affiliations

Multisensory Facilitation of Working Memory Training

Anja Pahor et al. J Cogn Enhanc. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Research suggests that memorization of multisensory stimuli benefits performance compared to memorization of unisensory stimuli; however, little is known about multisensory facilitation in the context of working memory (WM) training and transfer. To investigate this, 240 adults were randomly assigned to an N-back training task that consisted of visual-only stimuli, alternating visual and auditory blocks, or audio-visual (multisensory) stimuli, or to a passive control group. Participants in the active groups completed 13 sessions of N-back training (6.7 hours in total) and all groups completed a battery of WM tasks: untrained N-back tasks, Corsi Blocks, Sequencing, and Symmetry Span. The Multisensory group showed similar training N-level gain compared to the Visual Only group, and both of these groups outperformed the Alternating group on the training task. As expected, all three active groups significantly improved on untrained visual N-back tasks compared to the Control group. In contrast, the Multisensory group showed significantly greater gains on the Symmetry Span task and to a certain extent on the Sequencing task compared to other groups. These results tentatively suggest that incorporating multisensory objects in a WM training protocol can benefit performance on the training task and potentially facilitate transfer to complex WM span tasks.

Keywords: multisensory; training; transfer; working memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Enrollment
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Timeline of training and testing for passive and active groups. A 5–7 minute break was given between testing and training blocks and between two 20-minute training blocks.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Mean N-level achieved on a given day, split by visual and auditory blocks for the Alternating group. A dip on day 8 reflects transition from less abstract stimuli to more abstract stimuli (equivalent across groups).
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Difference scores for each group: V = Visual Only, A = Alternating Audio-visual, M = Multisensory, and C = Control (Passive); color coded as red, blue, green and gray, respectively. (A) Difference between highest N-level achieved at post-test relative to pre-test on an untrained visual N-back task. (B-D) Change in span on Forward Corsi Blocks, Sequencing, and Symmetry Span, respectively. Error bars represent S.E.M. * p <0.05, ** p < 0.01. Stars without lines indicate significant difference at post-test relative to pre-test in each group (Wilcoxon signed-rank test), whereas stars with lines indicate significant differences in change scores in one group relative to another (Kruskal-Wallis test).
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Self-reported improvement on tasks at post-test as a result of earlier sessions, shown as percentage per group; V = Visual Only, A = Alternating Audio-visual, M = Multisensory, and C = Control (Passive).

References

    1. Anguera JA, Boccanfuso J, Rintoul JL, Al-Hashimi O, Faraji F, Janowich J, … Gazzaley A (2013). Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature, 501(7465), 97–101. doi:10.1038/nature12486 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Au J, Gibson BC, Bunarjo K, Buschkuehl M, & Jaeggi SM (2020). Quantifying the Difference Between Active and Passive Control Groups in Cognitive Interventions Using Two Meta-analytical Approaches. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 4(2), 192–210. doi:10.1007/s41465-020-00164-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Au J, Sheehan E, Tsai N, Duncan GJ, Buschkuehl M, & Jaeggi SM (2015). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(2), 366–377. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0699-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boot WR, Simons DJ, Stothart C, & Stutts C (2013). The Pervasive Problem With Placebos in Psychology: Why Active Control Groups Are Not Sufficient to Rule Out Placebo Effects. Perspectives on Psychological Science : A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 8(4), 445–454. doi:10.1177/1745691613491271 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Broadbent HJ, Osborne T, Mareschal D, & Kirkham NZ (2019). Withstanding the test of time: Multisensory cues improve the delayed retention of incidental learning. Developmental Science, 22(1), e12726. doi:10.1111/desc.12726 - DOI - PubMed