Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec:140:79-92.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.033. Epub 2021 Sep 4.

Meta-analysis for individual participant data with a continuous exposure: A case study

Affiliations

Meta-analysis for individual participant data with a continuous exposure: A case study

Darsy Darssan et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: Methods for meta-analysis of studies with individual participant data and continuous exposure variables are well described in the statistical literature but are not widely used in clinical and epidemiological research. The purpose of this case study is to make the methods more accessible.

Study design and setting: A two-stage process is demonstrated. Response curves are estimated separately for each study using fractional polynomials. The study-specific curves are then averaged pointwise over all studies at each value of the exposure. The averaging can be implemented using fixed effects or random effects methods.

Results: The methodology is illustrated using samples of real data with continuous outcome and exposure data and several covariates. The sample data set, segments of Stata and R code, and outputs are provided to enable replication of the results.

Conclusion: These methods and tools can be adapted to other situations, including for time-to-event or categorical outcomes, different ways of modelling exposure-outcome curves, and different strategies for covariate adjustment.

Keywords: Continuous variables; Fractional polynomials; Individual participant data; Meta-analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations of interest: none.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Scatter plots and lowess fits for age at natural menopause and baseline body mass index for the sample data set.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Lowess plots of predicted values (and 95% confidence intervals) for age at natural menopause by body mass index for each study separately.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Lowess plots of the weights for each study that are used in the fixed effects and random effects meta-analyses.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Results of meta-analysis of the association between age at natural menopause and body mass index: lowess plots for estimates and 95% confidence intervals.

References

    1. Greenland S, Longnecker MP. Methods for trend estimation from summarized dose–response data, with applications to meta-analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology 1992; 135: 1301–1309 - PubMed
    1. Liu Q, Cook NR, Bergström A, Hsieh CC. A two-stage hierarchical regression model for meta-analysis of epidemiologic nonlinear dose–response data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2009; 53: 4157–4167,
    1. Rota M, Bellocco R, Scotti L, Tramacere I, Jenab M, Corrao G, La Vecchia C, Boffetta P, Bagnardi V. (2010), Random-effects meta-regression models for studying nonlinear dose–response relationship, with an application to alcohol and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Statist. Med 2010; 29: 2679–2687. doi:10.1002/sim.4041 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Debray TP, Moons KG, van Valkenhoef G, et al. Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis: a review of the methodology. Res Synth Methods. 2015; 6: 293–309. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1160 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Royston P, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W. Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea Statist. Med 2006; 25:127–141 - PubMed

Publication types