Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 13:12:730165.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.730165. eCollection 2021.

Cognitive Training Effectiveness on Memory, Executive Functioning, and Processing Speed in Individuals With Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review

Tânia Caetano  1   2   3 , Maria Salomé Pinho  1 , Eduardo Ramadas  2   3 , Cátia Clara  3 , Timóteo Areosa  2 , Maria Dos Anjos Dixe  2
Affiliations

Cognitive Training Effectiveness on Memory, Executive Functioning, and Processing Speed in Individuals With Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review

Tânia Caetano et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Background: Cerebral neuroplasticity is compromised due to substance abuse. There is damage to neuronal areas that are involved in memory and executive functioning. Treatments with worse outcomes are often associated with cognitive deficits that have resulted from substance dependence. However, there is evidence that cognitive training can lead to improvements in cognitive functions and can be useful when treating addictions. This systematic review aims to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of cognitive training in memory, executive functioning, and processing speed in individuals with substance use disorder (SUD). Methods: The Joanna Briggs Institute's PICO strategy was used to develop this systematic literature review. Four databases were searched (PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PsycINFO) to identify controlled randomized clinical studies and quasi-experimental studies, in English, Portuguese, and Spanish, from 1985 to 2019. The literature found was examined by two independent reviewers, who assessed the quality of studies that met the inclusion criteria. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for the randomized controlled trials and the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies were used to assess the risk of bias. In data extraction, the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews was considered. Results: From a total of 470 studies, 319 were selected for analysis after the elimination of duplicates. According to the inclusion criteria defined, 26 studies were eligible and evaluated. An evaluation was performed considering the participant characteristics, countries, substance type, study and intervention details, and key findings. Of the 26 selected studies, 14 considered only alcoholics, six included participants with various SUD (alcohol and other substances), three exclusively looked into methamphetamine-consuming users and another three into opioid/methadone users. Moreover, 18 studies found some kind of cognitive improvement, with two of these reporting only marginally significant effects. One study found improvements only in measures similar to the training tasks, and two others had ambiguous results. Conclusions: The included studies revealed the benefits of cognitive training with regard to improving cognitive functions in individuals with SUD. Memory was the most scrutinized cognitive function in this type of intervention, and it is also one of the areas most affected by substance use. Systematic Review Registration: [PROSPERO], identifier [CRD42020161039].

Keywords: cognitive training; executive functioning; memory; processing speed; substance use disorders; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

ER is the Executive and Clinical Director of VillaRamadas International Treatment Center, an institution that provides addiction treatment. Even though the intervention analyzed in this systematic review (cognitive training) does not feature in the center's current therapeutic program, there is the intention of studying its effectiveness with the center's population in the future. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Aromataris E., Munn Z. (2017). Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual. Em The Joanna Briggs Institute. Available online at: https://reviewersmanual.joannabriggs.org/ (accessed May 20, 2021).
    1. Bell M. D., Laws H. B., Petrakis I. B. (2017). A randomized controlled trial of cognitive remediation and work therapy in the early phase of substance use disorder recovery for older veterans: neurocognitive and substance use outcomes. Spec. Issue Cogn. Remediat. 40, 94–102. 10.1037/prj0000211 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bell M. D., Vissicchio N. A., Weinstein A. J. (2016). Cognitive training and work therapy for the treatment of verbal learning and memory deficits in veterans with alcohol use disorders. J. Dual Diagn. 12, 83–89. 10.1080/15504263.2016.1145779 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bordnick P. S., Carter B. L., Traylor A. C. (2011). What virtual reality research in addictions can tell us about the future of obesity assessment and treatment. J. Diabet. Sci. Technol. 5, 265–271. 10.1177/193229681100500210 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brooks S. J., Burch K. H., Maiorana S. A., Cocolas E., Schioth H. B., Nilsson E. K., et al. . (2016). Psychological intervention with working memory training increases basal ganglia volume: a VBM study of inpatient treatment for methamphetamine use. NeuroImage Clin. 12, 478–491. 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.08.019 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types