Partner perceptions are associated with objective sensor-measured adherence to oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea
- PMID: 34490690
- DOI: 10.1111/jsr.13462
Partner perceptions are associated with objective sensor-measured adherence to oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea
Abstract
The aims of the present prospective clinical study were to determine objective, sensor-measured adherence to a mandibular advancement device (MAD) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and to identify partner-specific adherence-related factors. A total of 77 eligible participants with mild, moderate, or severe OSA and who were non-adherent to continuous positive airway pressure (mean age 56.2 years) participated in the study (32.5% women). The mean (range) observation time between MAD delivery and final follow-up was 8.3 (3.4-16.5) months. The mean apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was 26.6 events/hr at baseline and 12.5 events/hr at the 8-month follow-up (both p < 0.001). The mean sensor-measured adherence at the 8-month follow-up was 60.1% for ≥4 hr/night of appliance use for ≥5 days/week. Average usage was 6.4 hr/night, when worn. The mean reduction in the AHI was significantly greater in the "good adherence" (Δ 17.4) than the "poor adherence" group (Δ11.0; p < 0.05). From the partner's perspective, the appliance had a positive effect on sharing a bedroom in the good- (55%) compared to the poor-adherence group (25%; p < 0.05) and on their relationship (51.7% versus 17.9%, respectively; p < 0.05). Regression analyses identified the partner's snoring and apneas to be the most significant factor predicting good adherence to MAD (odds ratio 4.4, 95% confidence interval 1.4-14.0). In conclusion, social factors, like partner perceptions, were positively associated with adherence, which indicate that partner's attitudes and support may be a resource that can be utilised to improve adherence in oral appliance treatment of OSA.
Keywords: compliance; longitudinal; psychosocial factors; sleep apnea syndrome; titration.
© 2021 European Sleep Research Society.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Almeida, F. R., Henrich, N., Marra, C., Lynd, L. D., Lowe, A. A., Tsuda, H., Fleetham, J. A., Pliska, B., & Ayas, N. (2013). Patient preferences and experiences of CPAP and oral appliances for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: A qualitative analysis. Sleep Breath, 17(2), 659-666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-012-0739-6
-
- Baron, C. E., Smith, T. W., Baucom, B. R., Uchino, B. N., Williams, P. G., Sundar, K. M., & Czajkowski, L. (2020). Relationship partner social behavior and continuous positive airway pressure adherence: The role of autonomy support. Health Psychology, 39(4), 325-334. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000827
-
- Berry, R. B., Budhiraja, R., Gottlieb, D. J., Gozal, D., Iber, C., Kapur, V. K., Marcus, C. L., Mehra, R., Parthasarathy, S., Quan, S. F., Redline, S., Strohl, K. P., Davidson Ward, S. L., Tangredi, M. M., & American, A. O. S. M. (2012). Rules for scoring respiratory events in sleep: Update of the 2007 AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events. Deliberations of the Sleep Apnea Definitions Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 8(5), 597-619. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.2172
-
- Berry, R. B., Hill, G., Thompson, L., & McLaurin, V. (2008). Portable monitoring and autotitration versus polysomnography for the diagnosis and treatment of sleep apnea. Sleep, 31(10), 1423-1431.
-
- Broström, A., Pakpour, A. H., Nilsen, P., Gardner, B., & Ulander, M. (2018). Promoting CPAP adherence in clinical practice: A survey of Swedish and Norwegian CPAP practitioners' beliefs and practices. Journal of Sleep Research, 27(6), e12675. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.12675
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources