Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 2;60(45):24059-24063.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202110719. Epub 2021 Oct 5.

Biocatalytic Asymmetric Cyclopropanations via Enzyme-Bound Iminium Ion Intermediates

Affiliations

Biocatalytic Asymmetric Cyclopropanations via Enzyme-Bound Iminium Ion Intermediates

Andreas Kunzendorf et al. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. .

Abstract

Cyclopropane rings are an important structural motif frequently found in many natural products and pharmaceuticals. Commonly, biocatalytic methodologies for the asymmetric synthesis of cyclopropanes rely on repurposed or artificial heme enzymes. Here, we engineered an unusual cofactor-independent cyclopropanation enzyme based on a promiscuous tautomerase for the enantioselective synthesis of various cyclopropanes via the nucleophilic addition of diethyl 2-chloromalonate to α,β-unsaturated aldehydes. The engineered enzyme promotes formation of the two new carbon-carbon bonds with excellent stereocontrol over both stereocenters, affording the desired cyclopropanes with high diastereo- and enantiopurity (d.r. up to 25:1; e.r. up to 99:1). Our results highlight the usefulness of promiscuous enzymes for expanding the biocatalytic repertoire for non-natural reactions.

Keywords: biocatalysis; catalytic promiscuity; cyclopropanation; enzyme engineering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Iminium ion biocatalysis, highlighting the key catalytic role of the N‐terminal proline residue (Pro‐1) of the 4‐OT enzyme. A) Proposed mechanism of the 4‐OT catalyzed Michael addition of nitromethane to cinnamaldehydes. B) Proposed mechanism of the 4‐OT catalyzed epoxidation reaction between hydroperoxides and cinnamaldehydes. C) Proposed mechanism of the 4‐OT catalyzed cyclopropanation reaction between diethyl 2‐halomalonates and cinnamaldehydes.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Engineering of 4‐OT for cyclopropanations. A) Reaction of the 4‐OT catalyzed cyclopropanation of diethyl 2‐chloromalonate and cinnamaldehyde to afford 1 a. B) Comparison of the specific activity of wild type 4‐OT and engineered 4‐OT variants for the cyclopropanation reaction between diethyl 2‐chloromalonate and cinnamaldehyde to yield 1 a. The specific activities are as follows: wt (3.0 mU mg−1), F50V (16.7 mU mg−1), M45C/F50A (36.0 mU mg−1), M45T/F50A (40.8 mU mg−1), M45L/F50V (43.7 mU mg−1), M45I/F50A (67.9 mU mg−1), M45V/F50A (89.4 mU mg−1). Reaction conditions: 1 mM cinnamaldehyde, 5 mM diethyl 2‐chloromalonate, 0.1 mg mL−1 4‐OT variant, 50 mM HEPES pH 6.5. Error bars represent the standard deviation of two measurements using the same enzyme batch (n=2).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. None
    1. Wessjohann L. A., Brandt W., Thiemann T., Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 1625–1648; - PubMed
    1. Talele T. T., J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 8712–8756. - PubMed
    1. None
    1. de Meijere A., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1979, 18, 809–826;
    2. Angew. Chem. 1979, 91, 867–884;

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources