Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging staging of tumour and nodal stage in rectal cancer treated by primary surgery: a population-based study
- PMID: 34491607
- DOI: 10.1111/codi.15905
Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging staging of tumour and nodal stage in rectal cancer treated by primary surgery: a population-based study
Abstract
Aim: The preoperative stage of rectal cancer is an important prognostic factor affecting treatment recommendations. Currently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used for clinical staging to identify patients who should be recommended for neoadjuvant oncological treatment. The aim of this work was to investigate the accuracy of the preoperative T- and N-stage and also involvement of the mesorectal fascia (MRF) as determined by MRI in a Swedish national cohort.
Method: Patients who had undergone resectional surgery for rectal cancer without neoadjuvant treatment in Sweden in the period 2013-2017 were identified through the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry (n = 2062). The T- and N-stage determined by preoperative MRI were compared with the histopathological results. The MRI-assessed MRF status was compared with the circumferential resection margin.
Results: Sensitivity for differentiating T1-2 from T3-4 was 69% and specificity 77%. Sensitivity to detect N1-2 was 42% and specificity 81%. Sensitivity for MRF positivity was 50% and specificity 92%. Agreement analysed by weighted kappa analysis was 0.47 for T-stage [confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.51], 0.24 for N-stage (CI 0.19-0.24) and 0.20 for MRF status (CI 0.12-0.29).
Conclusion: In this study, accuracy of the preoperative MRI was lower than expected for rectal cancers. Overstaging might lead to potentially harmful neoadjuvant treatment and understaging can lead to a higher risk of tumour recurrence. The results of this study show that efforts should be made to increase the accuracy of the preoperative evaluation in order to optimize treatment recommendations.
© 2021 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
Similar articles
-
Significance of MRI in rectal carcinoma therapy optimization - correlation of preoperative T- and N-staging with definitive histopathological findings.Neoplasma. 2019 May 23;66(3):494-498. doi: 10.4149/neo_2018_180522N334. Neoplasma. 2019. PMID: 30793609
-
Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of the mesorectal nodal status of patients with rectal cancer - Can it be trusted?Eur J Radiol. 2023 Aug;165:110961. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110961. Epub 2023 Jul 5. Eur J Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37423017
-
Evaluation of the Extent of Mesorectal Invasion and Mesorectal Fascia Involvement in Patients with T3 Rectal Cancer With 2-D and 3-D Transrectal Ultrasound: A Pilot Comparison Study With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings.Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 Nov;46(11):3008-3016. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.07.030. Epub 2020 Aug 28. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020. PMID: 32868155
-
Role of MRI for staging of rectal cancer.Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009 Apr;9(4):469-81. doi: 10.1586/era.09.13. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009. PMID: 19374600 Review.
-
Magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer: a surgeon's perspective.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb 28;20(8):2030-41. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i8.2030. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 24616572 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Assessing neoadjuvant therapy recommendations in 19 national and international guidelines for rectal cancer.Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Aug 5;28(1):94. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02969-5. Tech Coloproctol. 2024. PMID: 39102159 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neoadjuvant FOLFOXIRI prior to chemoradiotherapy for high-risk ("ugly") locally advanced rectal cancer: study protocol of a single-arm, multicentre, open-label, phase II trial (MEND-IT).BMC Cancer. 2022 Sep 6;22(1):957. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09947-w. BMC Cancer. 2022. PMID: 36068495 Free PMC article.
-
Magnetic resonance imaging-based lymph node radiomics for predicting the metastasis of evaluable lymph nodes in rectal cancer.World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 May 15;16(5):1849-1860. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i5.1849. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38764830 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of rectal cancer multidisciplinary conferences on patient care plans.Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jul;27(7):e70150. doi: 10.1111/codi.70150. Colorectal Dis. 2025. PMID: 40589073 Free PMC article.
-
Hartmann's procedure in rectal cancer surgery is often an intraoperative decision: a retrospective multicenter study.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Feb 7;409(1):55. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03237-8. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024. PMID: 38321307 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424.
-
- Rectal Cancer 2019. National quality report for the year 2019 from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. (in Swedish) [Rektalcancer 2019. Nationell kvalitetsrapport för år 2019 från Svenska Kolorektalcancerregistret] 2020.
-
- Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet. 1986;1:1479-82.
-
- Krook JE, Moertel CG, Gunderson LL, Wieand HS, Collins RT, Beart RW, et al. Effective surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk rectal carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:709-15.
-
- Adjuvant therapy for patients with colon and rectum cancer. Consensus statement National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference. 1990;8:1-25.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous