Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep-Oct;28(5):332-338.
doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000608.

Prehospital Hemorrhage Assessment Criteria: A Concise Review

Sara Di Carlo  1 , Giuseppe Cavallaro, Kenia Palomeque, Maurizio Cardi, Giuseppe Sica, Piero Rossi, Simone Sibio
Affiliations
Review

Prehospital Hemorrhage Assessment Criteria: A Concise Review

Sara Di Carlo et al. J Trauma Nurs. 2021 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Objective: Early assessment of the clinical status of trauma patients is crucial for guiding the treatment strategy, and it requires a rapid and systematic approach. The aim of this report is to critically review the assessment parameters currently used in the prehospital setting to quantify blood loss in trauma.

Data sources: Studies regarding hemorrhagic shock in trauma were pooled from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases using key words such as "hemorrhagic shock," "vital signs evaluation," "trauma," "blood loss," and "emergency medical service," alone or combined.

Study selection: Articles published since 2009 in English and Italian were considered eligible if containing data on assessment parameters in blood loss in adults.

Data extraction: Sixteen articles matching the inclusion criteria were considered in our study.

Data synthesis: Current prehospital assessment measures lack precise correlation with blood loss.

Conclusions: Traditional assessment parameters such as heart rate, systolic blood pressure, shock index, and Glasgow Coma Scale score often lag in providing accurate blood loss assessment. The current literature supports the need for a noninvasive, continuously monitored assessment parameter to identify early shock in the prehospital setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. (2021). Advanced trauma life support ATLS student course manual (10th ed.). Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons.
    1. Ashburn J. C., Harrison T., Ham J. J., Strote J. (2012). Emergency physician estimation of blood loss. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 13(4), 376–379. doi:10.5811/westjem.2011.9.6669
    1. Campion E. M., Cralley A., Robinson C., Sauaia A., Pieracci F. M., Lawless R. A., Burlew C. C. (2020). Prehospital end-tidal carbon dioxide predicts massive transfusion and death following trauma. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 89(4), 703–707. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000002846
    1. Cannon J. W. (2018). Hemorrhagic shock. The New England Journal of Medicine, 378(4), 370–379. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1705649
    1. Cardi M., Ibrahim K., Alizai S. W., Mohammad H., Garatti M., Rainone A., Sibio S. (2019). Injury patterns and causes of death in 953 patients with penetrating abdominal war wounds in a civilian independent non-governmental organization hospital in Lashkargah, Afghanistan. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 14(51), 1–8. doi:10.1186/s13017-019-0272-z. eCollection 2019