Comparative evaluation of agar dilution and broth microdilution by commercial and in-house plates for Bacteroides fragilis group: An economical and expeditious approach for resource-limited settings
- PMID: 34492368
- DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2021.102443
Comparative evaluation of agar dilution and broth microdilution by commercial and in-house plates for Bacteroides fragilis group: An economical and expeditious approach for resource-limited settings
Abstract
Objective: To compare the performance of agar dilution and broth microdilution by commercial and in-house prepared plates for the Bacteroides fragilis group. The cost analysis was performed to demonstrate that in-house prepared BMD plates were a suitable alternative to agar dilution given the high cost and low feasibility of incorporating commercial BMD plates in routine, particularly in the tertiary care institutes of many low- and middle-income countries.
Methods: Thirty B. fragilis group isolates were tested against six antibiotics, frequently used as empirical therapy for anaerobic infections including metronidazole, clindamycin, imipenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefoxitin, and chloramphenicol. The running consumable expenditure for all methodologies was calculated.
Results: The results demonstrated essential and categorical agreement of >90% for all antibiotics except cefoxitin, which showed <90% categorical agreement. No major or very major errors were observed. We observed a high agreement and strong concordance for MIC values between both methods and inter-rate reliability of >0.9 by Cohen's kappa analysis, indicating almost perfect agreement between both methods using either of the plates. In contrast to agar dilution, a 20.5 fold cost reduction was seen in BMD using in-house plates and a 5.8 fold reduction using commercial plates to test a single isolate. However, when testing 30 isolates concurrently the cost significantly increased for commercial BMD plates by 8.4 folds, and only 1.03 fold cost reduction was seen with in-house BMD plates.
Conclusion: BMD gives comparable results to agar dilution and can be considered a method of choice to test a small number of samples. The technique is an economical option when plates are standardized in-house and could be employed for susceptibility testing of the B. fragilis group.
Keywords: Agar dilution method; Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Bacteroides fragilis group; Broth microdilution method; In-house prepared BMD plates.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Development of EUCAST disk diffusion method for susceptibility testing of the Bacteroides fragilis group isolates.Anaerobe. 2015 Feb;31:65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Nov 11. Anaerobe. 2015. PMID: 25464140
-
Susceptibility trends of Bacteroides fragilis group isolates from Buenos Aires, Argentina.Rev Argent Microbiol. 2007 Jul-Sep;39(3):156-60. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2007. PMID: 17987852
-
Evaluation of microdilution trays (sensititre) for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Bacteroides fragilis.Med Microbiol Immunol. 1978 Oct 20;165(3):147-51. doi: 10.1007/BF02123171. Med Microbiol Immunol. 1978. PMID: 723780
-
In vitro susceptibility vs. in vivo efficacy of various antimicrobial agents against the Bacteroides fragilis group.Rev Infect Dis. 1991 Nov-Dec;13(6):1170-80. doi: 10.1093/clinids/13.6.1170. Rev Infect Dis. 1991. PMID: 1775850 Review.
-
In vitro effect of antibiotics on biofilm formation by Bacteroides fragilis group strains isolated from intestinal microbiota of dogs and their antimicrobial susceptibility.Anaerobe. 2014 Aug;28:24-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 May 4. Anaerobe. 2014. PMID: 24799339 Review.
Cited by
-
Study on the Mechanism of Levofloxacin Combined with Imipenem Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2024 Feb;196(2):690-700. doi: 10.1007/s12010-023-04516-8. Epub 2023 May 13. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2024. PMID: 37178250
-
Can beta-lactamase resistance genes in anaerobic Gram-negative gut bacteria transfer to gut aerobes?J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2023 Jun;76(6):355-359. doi: 10.1038/s41429-023-00608-z. Epub 2023 Mar 30. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2023. PMID: 36997726
-
Time for Some Group Therapy: Update on Identification, Antimicrobial Resistance, Taxonomy, and Clinical Significance of the Bacteroides fragilis Group.J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Sep 21;60(9):e0236120. doi: 10.1128/jcm.02361-20. Epub 2022 Jun 14. J Clin Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 35700139 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biocontrol of rusted root rot in Panax ginseng by a combination of extracts from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens YY8 crude protein and Enterobacteriaceae YY115 ethyl acetate.BMC Microbiol. 2024 Sep 2;24(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12866-024-03475-2. BMC Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 39223475 Free PMC article.
-
Anaerobic Gram-Negative Bacteria: Role as a Reservoir of Antibiotic Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 May 22;12(5):942. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12050942. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37237845 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical