Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages: Increased Risk of Late Postoperative Subsidence Without a Real Improvement of Perioperative Outcomes: A Clinical Monocentric Study
- PMID: 34492389
- DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.127
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages: Increased Risk of Late Postoperative Subsidence Without a Real Improvement of Perioperative Outcomes: A Clinical Monocentric Study
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is one of several approaches to lumbar interbody fusion that has proven to be a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic lumbar degenerative disease The clinical outcomes of MIS-TLIF are generally favorable, but there is still controversy regarding its ability to restore sagittal alignment. For this reason, expandable transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cages have been developed and designed to improve ability to restore disc height and segmental lordosis. The use of expandable cages in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion has increased drastically; however, it is not clear how effective cage expansion is in regard to disc space lordosis, distraction, and long-term outcome.
Methods: We reviewed a cohort of patients with symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc pathology who underwent MIS-TLIF at our institution. We compared clinical and radiographic outcomes of expandable versus nonexpandable cage use in MIS-TLIF focusing on mean changes in segmental lordosis, disc height, and postoperative complications. The results were compared with other studies reported in the international literature.
Results: Mean change in segmental lordosis was not significantly different between the 2 groups. A significantly higher rate of postoperative subsidence was demonstrated in the expandable cage group.
Conclusion: This study established that expandable cage use in single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion did not reduce the rate of postoperative complications, but rather significantly increased a patient's risk of postoperative subsidence. Expandable cages do not presently demonstrate improved clinical outcomes or improved sagittal alignment compared with static cages.
Keywords: Degenerative discopathy; Expandable cage; MS-TLIF; Minimally invasive; Sagittal alignment; Spine.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E10. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17197. Neurosurg Focus. 2017. PMID: 28760032
-
Assessing the Difference in Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Expandable Cage and Nonexpandable Cage Among Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.World Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;127:596-606.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.284. Epub 2019 Apr 5. World Neurosurg. 2019. PMID: 30954733
-
Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E8. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17562. Neurosurg Focus. 2018. PMID: 29290133
-
Expandable versus static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cages: comparing radiographic outcomes and complication profiles.Spine J. 2025 Feb;25(2):237-243. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.030. Epub 2024 Sep 28. Spine J. 2025. PMID: 39349256
-
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Sep 18;22(1):802. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04687-7. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021. PMID: 34537023 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comparison of the efficacy of expandable interbody fusion cage (EXP-IFC) and non-expandable interbody fusion cage (NE-IFC) in MIS-TLIF for lumbar degenerative diseases: A systematic retrospective study on 62 patients.Front Surg. 2022 Oct 18;9:1008171. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1008171. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 36329978 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing expandable and static interbody cages in lumbar interbody fusion.J Spine Surg. 2023 Mar 30;9(1):1-5. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-5. Epub 2023 Feb 14. J Spine Surg. 2023. PMID: 37038415 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF) with Lateral Modular Plate Fixation: Preliminary Report on Clinical and Radiological Outcomes.Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2023;135:431-437. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-36084-8_66. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2023. PMID: 38153505
-
Relationship between lumbar lordosis, pelvic parameters, PI-LL mismatch and outcome after short fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative disease. Literature review, rational and presentation of public study protocol: RELApSE study (registry for evaluation of lumbar artrodesis sagittal alignEment).World Neurosurg X. 2023 Jan 27;18:100162. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100162. eCollection 2023 Apr. World Neurosurg X. 2023. PMID: 36818735 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predictors of Postoperative Segmental and Overall Lumbar Lordosis in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Consecutive Case Series.Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):425-437. doi: 10.1177/21925682231193610. Epub 2023 Jul 31. Global Spine J. 2025. PMID: 37522797 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical