Geographic landscape of foreign medical graduates in US neurosurgery training programs from 2007 to 2017

Abstract

Objective: Although foreign medical graduates (FMGs) have been essential to the US physician workforce, the increasing competitiveness has made it progressively challenging for FMGs to match in US neurosurgery programs. We describe geographic origins and characteristics associated with successful match into US neurosurgery training programs.

Methods: Retrospective review of AANS membership data (2007-2017). Scopus was used to collect bibliometrics.

Results: From 2009 neurosurgical residents, 165 (8.2%) were FMGs. Most were male (n = 148; 89.6%) with a median age of 34.0 years. Top six feeder countries (TFC) included India (13.9%; n = 23), Lebanon and Pakistan (9.1%; n = 15), Caribbean Region (7.2%; n = 12), Mexico (6.67%; n = 11), and Greece (3.6%; n = 6). Compared to FMGs from non-top feeder countries (NTFC), TFC FMGs had higher H-indices (2 vs 4, p = 0.049), greater number of publications (2 vs 5, p = 0.04), were more likely to have an MBBS/MBBCh (n = 38 vs n = 17, p = 0.03), and had twice as many candidates from major feeder medical schools that successfully matched into a US neurosurgery program (n = 43 vs NTFC = 20, p < 0.001). NTFC FMGs were almost 3-times more likely to match at an affiliated neurosurgery program (8 vs TFC = 3, p = 0.03), while TFC FMGs were 1.5-times more likely to match at an NIH Top-40 program (33 vs NTFC = 21, p = 0.03).

Conclusions: TFC graduates have higher bibliometrics, frequently come from major feeder schools, and have greater match success at a broader selection of programs and NIH top-40 programs. Future studies characterizing FMG country and medical school origins may enable foreign students to geographically target institutions of interest and could allow US programs to better evaluate foreign training environments.

Keywords: Foreign medical graduates; Geography; Match; Neurosurgery; Residency.