Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep 7;20(1):41.
doi: 10.1186/s12991-021-00361-3.

Long-term oral blonanserin treatment for schizophrenia: a review of Japanese long-term studies

Affiliations
Review

Long-term oral blonanserin treatment for schizophrenia: a review of Japanese long-term studies

Mitsukuni Murasaki et al. Ann Gen Psychiatry. .

Abstract

In general, the course of schizophrenia is chronic accompanied not only by positive and negative symptoms but also by cognitive dysfunction associated with psychosocial disability, and thus treatment combining antipsychotics and psychological therapy is considered promising. This review focused on two prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 long-term studies for approval of oral blonanserin for the treatment of schizophrenia. These two studies included both inpatients and outpatients with variable disease duration or symptom prominence according to the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The selected two studies consisted of almost the same study schedule and eligibility criteria but different protocols regarding prior medications and concomitant antipsychotics. The proportion of patients who had a baseline PANSS negative score higher than the positive score was 82.2 and 67.2% in the two studies. In both studies, patients with an illness duration of ≥ 10 years were the most common. Based on the clinical symptoms at baseline, the physician determined the treatment: blonanserin monotherapy, blonanserin in combination with the existing antipsychotic medication, or therapy simplified to haloperidol together with blonanserin. The 28-week completion rate for long-term blonanserin treatment was high in both studies (82.2 and 78.7%). The types of adverse events in both studies were similar to those in the preceding 8-week randomized, active-controlled studies in Japan, which were included in the application package for the approval of oral blonanserin for patients with schizophrenia. Long-term blonanserin use did not increase the risk of extrapyramidal symptoms but reduced the dose of antiparkinsonian drugs, minimally affecting functioning. In both studies, the PANSS total score, positive score, and negative score were improved at the last observation carried forward compared with those at baseline. In conclusion, blonanserin is useful for long-term treatment of chronic schizophrenic patients when the appropriate management of clinical symptoms and adverse drug reactions are applied. Blonanserin might represent a promising treatment option that partially or completely relieves patients with chronic schizophrenia of polypharmacy. Blonanserin may possibly fit both the current real-world clinical setting and the currently recommended approach to antipsychotic medication.

Keywords: Atypical antipsychotics; Blonanserin; Dopamine D3 receptor antagonist; Long-term treatment; Schizophrenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

MM reports personal fees from Meiji Seika Pharma, Otsuka pharma, Shionogi Pharma, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Janssen, and Astellas, outside the submitted work.

HN and YI are the employees of Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.

TK reports personal fees from Otsuka, Janssen, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Meiji Seika Pharma, Eisai, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and FUJIFILM Toyama Pharmaceutical; other from Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, HISAMITSU PHARMACEUTICAL, and Takeda Pharmaceutical, outside the submitted work.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Harvey PD, Sand M. Pharmacological augmentation of psychosocial and remediation training efforts in schizophrenia. Front Psychiatry. 2017;8:177. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00177. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andreasen NC, Olsen S. Negative v positive schizophrenia. Definition and validation. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982;39(7):789–794. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290070025006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Regier DA, Narrow WE, Rae DS, Manderscheid RW, Locke BZ, Goodwin FK. The de facto US mental and addictive disorders service system: Epidemiologic Catchment Area prospective 1-year prevalence rates of disorders and services. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50(2):85–94. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820140007001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saha S, Chant D, Welham J, McGrath J. A systematic review of the prevalence of schizophrenia. PLoS Med. 2005;2(5):e141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020141. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bucci P, Galderisi S. Categorizing and assessing negative symptoms. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2017;30(3):201–208. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000322. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources