Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov;47(7):1469-1477.
doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.08.010. Epub 2021 Aug 20.

The efficacy and safety of fractional CO2 laser therapy in the treatment of burn scars: A meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

The efficacy and safety of fractional CO2 laser therapy in the treatment of burn scars: A meta-analysis

Weihai Peng et al. Burns. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Although we have numerous publications about the effect of fractional CO2 laser therapy for burn scars, quantitative data about its efficacy and safety are sparse. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of fractional CO2 laser therapy for the treatment of burn scars. Pertinent studies were identified by a search of PubMed, Embase and Web of Science up to 20 September 2020. Weighted mean difference (WMD) was conducted to combine the results, and a random-effect model was used to pool the results. Publication bias was estimated using Begg and Egger's regression asymmetry test. Twenty articles were included. Our pooled results suggested that fractional CO2 laser therapy significantly improved the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score (WMD = -3.24, 95%CI: -4.30, -2.18; P < 0.001). Moreover, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)-patient (WMD = -14.05, 95%CI: -22.44, -5.65; P = 0.001) and Observer (WMD = -6.31, 95%CI: -8.48, -4.15; P < 0.001) also showed significant improvements with the treatment of fractional CO2 laser therapy. Fractional CO2 laser significantly reduced scar thickness measured with ultrasonography (WMD = -0.54, 95%CI: -0.97, -0.10; P < 0.001). For other outcomes, including pigmentation, vascularity, pliability, and height of scar, vascularity and relief, laser therapy was associated with significant improvements. However, only the cutometer measure R2 (scar elasticity) (WMD = -0.06, 95%CI: -0.10, -0.01; P = 0.023) was significantly improved with the laser therapy, but cutometer measures R0 (scar firmness) (WMD = 0.03, 95%CI: -0.04, 0.09; P = 0.482) was not. Side effects and complications induced by fractional CO2 laser were mild and tolerable. Fractional CO2 laser therapy significantly improved both the signs and symptoms of burn scars. Considering potential limitations, more large-scale, well-designed RCTs are needed to verify our findings.

Keywords: Burn scars; Fractional CO(2) laser therapy; Meta-analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources