Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 7;11(9):e053004.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053004.

Single session compared with multiple sessions of education and exercise for older adults with spinal pain in an advanced practice physiotherapy model of care: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Simon Lafrance  1   2 , Carlo Santaguida  3 , Kadija Perreault  4   5 , Brenna Bath  6   7 , Kednapa Thavorn  8   9 , Debbie Feldman  10   11 , Luc J Hébert  5 , Julio Fernandes  12   13 , François Desmeules  10   2
Affiliations

Single session compared with multiple sessions of education and exercise for older adults with spinal pain in an advanced practice physiotherapy model of care: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Simon Lafrance et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a single session compared with multiple sessions of education and exercise for older adults with spinal pain treated conservatively in an advanced practice physiotherapy model of care.

Methods and analysis: In this pragmatic randomised controlled trial, 152 older adults (≥65 years old) with neck or back pain initially referred for a consultation in neurosurgery, but treated conservatively, will be recruited through the advanced practice physiotherapy neurosurgery CareAxis programme in the Montreal region (Quebec, Canada). In the CareAxis programme, older patients with spinal pain are triaged by an advance practice physiotherapist and are offered conservative care and only potential surgical candidates are referred to a neurosurgeon. Participants will be randomised into one of two arms: 1-a single session or 2-multiple sessions (6 sessions over 12 weeks) of education and exercise with the advance practice physiotherapist (1:1 ratio). The primary outcome measure will be the Brief Pain Inventory (pain severity and interference subscales). Secondary measures will include self-reported disability (the Neck Disability Index or Oswestry Disability Index), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, satisfaction with care questionnaires (9-item Visit-specific Satisfaction Questionnaire and MedRisk), and the EQ-5D-5L. Participants' healthcare resources use and related costs will be measured. Outcomes will be collected at baseline and at 6, 12 and 26 weeks after enrolment. Intention-to-treat analyses will be performed, and repeated mixed-model analysis of variance will assess differences between treatment arms. Cost-utility analyses will be conducted from the perspective of the healthcare system.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval has been obtained from the Comité d'éthique de la recherche du CIUSS de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (FWA00001935 and IRB00002087). Results of this study will be presented to different stakeholders, published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences.

Protocol version: V.4 August 2021.

Trial registration number: NCT04868591; Pre-results.

Keywords: health economics; musculoskeletal disorders; organisation of health services; rehabilitation medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: CS declares being the Chief Medical Officer for CareAxis, a non-profit organisation involving an APP model of care for adults with spinal pain, and being a consultant for Medtronic and for Stryker, two medical devices and technology firms.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart. APP, advanced practice physiotherapy; CRDS, Centre de répartition des demandes de service.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Woolf AD, Erwin J, March L. The need to address the burden of musculoskeletal conditions. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2012;26:183–224. 10.1016/j.berh.2012.03.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coyte PC, Asche CV, Croxford R, et al. . The economic cost of musculoskeletal disorders in Canada. Arthritis Care Res 1998;11:315–25. 10.1002/art.1790110503 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, et al. . A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:2028–37. 10.1002/art.34347 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, et al. . The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:968–74. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borghouts JAJ, Koes BW, Vondeling H, et al. . Cost-Of-Illness of neck pain in the Netherlands in 1996. Pain 1999;80:629–36. 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00268-1 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data