Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 26;97(17):e1727-e1736.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012725. Epub 2021 Sep 7.

Association Between Body Mass Index and Disability in Children With Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease

Affiliations

Association Between Body Mass Index and Disability in Children With Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease

Gabrielle A Donlevy et al. Neurology. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: This study examined the association between body mass index (BMI) and disability in children with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT).

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 477 patients with CMT who were 3 to 20 years of age from the Inherited Neuropathy Consortium and 316 age- and sex-matched healthy children from the 1,000 Norms Project. BMI was categorized according to the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) criteria, and BMI categorization was compared with healthy children. IOTF categories (adult equivalent BMI cut points) were severely underweight (BMI <17 kg/m2), underweight (BMI ≥17-<18.5 kg/m2), healthy weight (BMI ≥18.5-<25 kg/m2), overweight (BMI ≥25-<30 kg/m2), and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). Scores on the 0 to 44-point CMT Pediatric Scale (CMTPedS), a well-validated measure of disability, were examined in relation to BMI.

Results: There was a higher proportion of children with CMT categorized as severely underweight (5.7% vs 0.3%), underweight (10.3% vs 5.1%), and obese (7.3% vs 3.8%) (p < 0.05). Fewer children with CMT were categorized as healthy weight (61.8% vs 74.4%) (p < 0.05), and the proportion of overweight (14.9% vs 16.5%) between groups was similar. CMTPedS scores (mean ± SD) for weight categories were as follows: severely underweight 27 ± 9, underweight 20 ± 8, healthy weight 17 ± 9, overweight 17 ± 9, and obese 22 ± 10. Compared to children with a healthy weight with CMT, being severely underweight was associated with being more disabled (p < 0.001), as was being obese (p = 0.015).

Discussion: The proportion of children with CMT who are underweight or obese is higher compared to age- and sex-matched healthy children. In children with CMT, being underweight or obese is associated with greater disability, when compared to children with CMT of healthy weight.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Mean CMTPedS Disability Scores (With Standard Error) According to BMI Categories
Severely underweight (body mass index [BMI] <17 kg/m2), underweight (BMI ≥17 to <18.5 kg/m2), healthy weight (BMI ≥18.5–<25 kg/m2), overweight (BMI ≥25–<30 kg/m2), and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) (with standard error). Horizontal bars represent significance between groups. CMTPedS = Charcot-Marie-Tooth Pediatric Scale. Significance represented by *p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 2
Figure 2. CMTPedS Item Scores by BMI Categories for Hand Dexterity (Functional Dexterity Test, Nine-Hole Peg Test), Muscle Strength (Grip, Plantarflexion Dorsiflexion), and Power (Long Jump)
Higher mean (SE) item scores indicate higher disability. CMTPedS = Charcot-Marie-Tooth Pediatric Scale. Horizontal bars are significant differences between body mass index (BMI) categories represented by *p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3. CMTPedS Items Scores by BMI Categories for Balance, Endurance (6-Minute Walk Test), Gait, and Sensation (Pinprick, Vibration)
Higher mean (SE) item scores indicate higher disability. Horizontal bars are significant differences between body mass index (BMI) categories represented by *p ≤ 0.05. CMTPedS = Charcot-Marie-Tooth Pediatric Scale.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rossor AM, Polke JM, Houlden H, Reilly MM. Clinical implications of genetic advances in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9(10):562-571. - PubMed
    1. Hoyle JC, Isfort MC, Roggenbuck J, Arnold WD. The genetics of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: current trends and future implications for diagnosis and management. Appl Clin Genet. 2015;8:235-243. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burns J, Ouvrier R, Estilow T, et al. . Validation of the Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Pediatric Scale as an outcome measure of disability. Ann Neurol. 2012;71(5):642-652. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patzko A, Shy M. Update on Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2011;11(1):78-88. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pareyson D, Saveri P, Pisciotta C. New developments in Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy and related diseases. Curr Opin Neurol. 2017;30(5):471-480. - PubMed