Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 2:1-20.
doi: 10.1007/s10796-021-10193-x. Online ahead of print.

Advancing the Understanding of the Role of Responsible AI in the Continued Use of IoMT in Healthcare

Affiliations

Advancing the Understanding of the Role of Responsible AI in the Continued Use of IoMT in Healthcare

Fatema Al-Dhaen et al. Inf Syst Front. .

Abstract

This paper examines the continuous intention by healthcare professionals to use the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) in combination with responsible artificial intelligence (AI). Using the theory of Diffusion of Innovation (DOI), a model was developed to determine the continuous intention to use IoMT taking into account the risks and complexity involved in using AI. Data was gathered from 276 healthcare professionals through a survey questionnaire across hospitals in Bahrain. Empirical outcomes reveal nine significant relationships amongst the constructs. The findings show that despite contradictions associated with AI, continuous intention to use behaviour can be predicted during the diffusion of IoMT. This study advances the understanding of the role of responsible AI in the continued use of IoMT in healthcare and extends DOI to address the diffusion of two innovations concurrently.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Awareness; Diffusion of innovation; Internet of medical things; Novelty seeking; Responsible AI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Proposed Research Model (Source: Adapted from Rogers, 1995)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Structural model with regression weights
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Moderation effect of AI Awareness

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abildgaard J, Saksvik P, Nielsen K. How to measure the intervention process? An assessment of qualitative and quantitative approaches to data collection in the process evaluation of organizational interventions. Frontiers in Psychology. 2016;7:1–10. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01380. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abubakar, F. M., & Ahmad, H. B. (2013). The moderating effect of technology awareness on the relationship between UTAUT constructs and behavioural intention to use technology: A conceptual paper. Australian journal of business and management research, 3(2), 14-23. www.ajbmr.com_articlepdf_aus-29-75i02n3a2.pdf (d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront....
    1. Agarwal R, Prasad J. Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences. 1999;30(2):361–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x. - DOI
    1. Alam MZ, Hu W, Barua Z. Using the UTAUT model to determine factors affecting acceptance and use of mobile health (mHealth) services in Bangladesh. Journal of Studies in Social Sciences. 2018;17(2):137–172.
    1. Al-Gahtani SS. Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: A structural equation model. Applied Computing and Informatics. 2016;12(1):27–50. doi: 10.1016/j.aci.2014.09.001. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources