Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;8(1):410-420.
doi: 10.1002/cre2.480. Epub 2021 Sep 7.

The effect of orthodontic treatment on the periodontium and soft tissue esthetics in adult patients

Affiliations

The effect of orthodontic treatment on the periodontium and soft tissue esthetics in adult patients

Reem S Abdelhafez et al. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: Most patients seek orthodontic treatment to achieve an esthetic outcome. Orthodontic treatment has possible negative sequelae. The aim of this study is to assess these possible effects on the periodontium and tissue esthetics.

Methods: One hundred fifty-six patients who have completed orthodontic treatment at Jordan University of Science and Technology clinics were recruited. They were divided into extraction and nonextraction subgroups. Another 155 patients never undergoing orthodontic treatment were assessed. The height of papilla, width of keratinized gingiva, gingival recession, degree of tooth display, smile line, crestal bone level, and proximal caries were assessed. Chi- square test was used for categorical/discrete variables while independent t-test was used for continuous variables. The level of significance was set at (p ≤ 0.05).

Results: The mean age was 22 years with no significant difference between the groups. There was a significant difference between "ortho" and "nonortho" groups in tooth display and keratinized gingiva (p = 0.006 and <0.001, respectively). The overall crestal bone level, smile line, recession, and papilla fill did not show any significant differences (p = 0.200, 0.067, 0.120, and 0.066, respectively). The crestal bone level in the upper and lower anterior segments was significantly lower in the "ortho" treated group compared to the "nonortho" treated group (p = 0.002 and 0.005, respectively). A significant difference between "extraction" and "nonextraction" groups was in the width of keratinized gingiva (p = 0.003) and the number of teeth displayed (p < 0.001). Despite reaching statistical significance these differences are not necessarily of clinical significance.

Conclusion: Orthodontic treatment clearly affects the periodontal tissues; however, the detrimental effects appear to be minimal. Patients with history of orthodontic treatment might have lower crestal bone levels at certain sites and this should not be confused with periodontal disease.

Keywords: esthetics; orthodontics; periodontium; soft tissue.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean of smile line for the sample population by tooth among treatment status
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean of gingival recession for the sample population by tooth among treatment status
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean of keratinized gingiva for the sample population by tooth among treatment status
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean of crestal bone level for the sample population by tooth among treatment status
Figure 5
Figure 5
Percent of surfaces with proximal caries for the sample population by treatment status

References

    1. Andrews, W. A. (2008). AP relationship of the maxillary central incisors to the forehead in adult white females. Angle Orthodontist, 78(4), 662–669. - PubMed
    1. Baxter, D. H. (1967). The effect of orthodontic treatment on alveolar bone adjacent to the cetnento‐enamel junction. Angle Orthodontist, 37(1), 35–47. - PubMed
    1. Bhuvaneswaran, M. (2010). Principles of smile design. Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 13(4), 225–232. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bishara, S. E. , Cummins, D. M. , Jakobsen, J. R. , & Zaher, A. R. (1995). Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in class II, division 1 cases treated with and without extractions. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 107(1), 28–37. - PubMed
    1. Bishara, S. E. , Cummins, D. M. , & Zaher, A. R. (1997). Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 111(1), 18–27. - PubMed

Publication types