Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 1;51(2):20210138.
doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20210138. Epub 2021 Sep 8.

Determination of a cone-beam CT low-dose protocol for root fracture diagnosis in non-endodontically treated anterior maxillary teeth

Affiliations

Determination of a cone-beam CT low-dose protocol for root fracture diagnosis in non-endodontically treated anterior maxillary teeth

Fedil Andraws Yalda et al. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. .

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine a "low-dose protocol" which provides acceptable diagnostic accuracy for detection of root fractures in unrestored anterior maxillary teeth, using an ex vivo model.

Methods: 48 maxillary anterior teeth, half with horizontal or oblique root fractures, were imaged using CBCT in an anthropomorphic model. Nine X-ray exposure combinations were used, including the manufacturer's standard ("reference") exposure and high-resolution settings ("HiRes"), by varying kV, exposure time, and rotation angle. Measurements of Dose Area Product (DAP) were recorded. Five dental radiologists assessed the scans for root fractures and judged image quality. Parameters of diagnostic accuracy were calculated, including area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (Az). Objective measures of image quality were made at the same exposure combinations using an image quality phantom.

Results: Although there was a significant linear relationship between DAP and mean Az, only the lowest DAP exposure combination had a mean Az significantly different to the reference exposure. There was no significant effect on other diagnostic accuracy parameters when using HiRes compared with the reference exposure. There was a significant positive relationship between DAP and contrast resolution. HiRes did not significantly improve contrast resolution and made a small improvement to spatial resolution.

Conclusions: Scope existed for radiation dose reduction compared with the manufacturer's guidance. There was no improvement in diagnostic accuracy using HiRes settings. A cautious recommendation for this CBCT machine is that it is possible to achieve a dose reduction of about 20% compared with the reference exposure parameters.

Keywords: Cone-beam computed tomography; Diagnosis; Radiation dosage; Radiologic; Technology; Tooth fractures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Cross-sectional images of the same root, oriented identically, taken from CBCT scans at each of the nine exposure combinations. There is an oblique fracture line running through the apical and middle thirds of the root. Images at HalfR/70kV, HalfR/80kV, STD/70kV and HiRes/70kV appear “noisy” or “grainy” and it is difficult to see the fracture line clearly except for HiRes70, in which a faint radiolucent line is seen.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Example cross-sectional image taken from the micro-CT scan of the same tooth as in Figure 1.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for each of the nine exposure combinations, derived from mean data from the five radiologists in the study. For clarity, three graphs are presented, one for each of the operating modes. (a) “half-rotation standard” (HalfR), (b) “full rotation standard” (STD) and (c) “Hi-Resolution” (HiRes), although the reference exposure combination of STD/90kV is included on all.

References

    1. Diangelis AJ, Andreasen JO, Ebeleseder KA, Kenny DJ, Trope M, Sigurdsson A, et al. Guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 1. fractures and Luxations of permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 2017; 39: 401–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.01103.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Horner K, Barry S, Dave M, Dixon C, Littlewood A, Pang CL, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of cone beam computed tomography in paediatric dentistry: a systematic review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2020; 21: 407–26. doi: 10.1007/s40368-019-00504-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salineiro FCS, Kobayashi-Velasco S, Braga MM, Cavalcanti MGP. Radiographic diagnosis of root fractures: a systematic review, meta-analyses and sources of heterogeneity. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2017; 46: 20170400. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20170400 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ludlow JB, Timothy R, Walker C, Hunter R, Benavides E, Samuelson DB, et al. Effective dose of dental CBCT-a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015; 44: 20140197. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140197 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. White SC, Scarfe WC, Schulze RKW, Lurie AG, Douglass JM, Farman AG, et al. The image gently in dentistry campaign: promotion of responsible use of maxillofacial radiology in dentistry for children. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2014; 118: 257–61. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.06.001 - DOI - PubMed