Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 1;18(4):438-444.
doi: 10.4274/tjps.galenos.2020.58897.

Analytical Method Development and Validation for Simultaneous Determination of Simvastatin and Mupirocin Using Reverse-Phase High-pressure Liquid Chromatographic Method

Affiliations

Analytical Method Development and Validation for Simultaneous Determination of Simvastatin and Mupirocin Using Reverse-Phase High-pressure Liquid Chromatographic Method

Rupali Kale et al. Turk J Pharm Sci. .

Abstract

Objectives: This study was aimed to develop and validate the use of reverse-phase high pressure liquid chromatographic method for the estimation of simvastatin (SIM) and mupirocin (MUP) simultaneously.

Materials and methods: The chromatographic method developed is optimized for flow rate with the column, solvent, and buffer used and mobile phase ratio, molarity, and pH. The validation of the optimized method and the forced degradation studies of both drugs (under acidic, alkaline, oxidation, heat, light, and neutral conditions) were conducted following the The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use guidelines.

Results: Kromasil C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) with ultraviolet detection at 224 nm and acetonitrile/phosphate buffer (30 mM, 70:30 v/v, pH 3.5; adjustment done using orthophosphoric acid) as mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.1 mL/min were observed to provide a good resolution for MUP and SIM at retention times of 2.32±0.008 and 13.55±0.254 min, respectively, with high accuracy (percent recovery was 99.69±0.82 for MUP and 101.10±0.02 for SIM) and linearity in the range of 5-30 µg/mL (r2: 0.9969 for MUP and r2: 0.9959 for SIM). The diagnostic limit and the lower limit of determination were 0.771±0.234 and 2.338±0.246 μg/mL for MUP and 0.595±0.282 and 1.803±0.334 µg/mL for SIM, respectively. The validated method was used to understand the degradation behavior of both drugs after the forced degradation studies.

Conclusion: The analytical method developed is determined to be specific, sensitive, precise, and accurate for the estimation of MUP and SIM simultaneously in the combined dosage form.

Keywords: Simvastatin; mupirocin; stability; validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors. The authors are solely responsible for the content and writing of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overlaid spectra of MUP and SIM MUP: Mupirocin, SIM: Simvastatin
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Chromatogram of the placebo solution. (B) Chromatogram of the formulation showing simultaneous estimation of MUP at 2.33 min and SIM at 13.56 min of retention time MUP: Mupirocin, SIM: Simvastatin
Figure 3
Figure 3
Degradation patterns of MUP and SIM under acidic conditions MUP: Mupirocin, SIM: Simvastatin
Figure 4
Figure 4
Degradation patterns of MUP and SIM under alkali conditions MUP: Mupirocin, SIM: Simvastatin
Figure 5
Figure 5
Degradation patterns of MUP and SIM under oxidative conditions MUP: Mupirocin, SIM: Simvastatin
Figure 6
Figure 6
Degradation patterns of MUP and SIM under neutral conditions MUP: Mupirocin, SIM: Simvastatin
Figure 7
Figure 7
Degradation patterns of MUP and SIM under thermal conditions MUP: Mupirocin, SIM: Simvastatin
Figure 8
Figure 8
Degradation patterns of MUP and SIM after photodegradation MUP: Mupirocin, SIM: Simvastatin

Similar articles

References

    1. Sujata S. Recent advances in topical wound care. Indian J Plast Surg. 2012;45:379–387. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thornton SC, Taylor SC, Weinberg JM. Topical antimicrobial agents in dermatology. Clin Dermatol. 2003;21:70–77. - PubMed
    1. Dumville JC, Lipsky BA, Hoey C, Cruciani M, Fiscon M, Xia J. Topical antimicrobial agents for treating foot ulcers in people with diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;14:6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dai T, Huang YY, Sharma SK, Hashmi JT, Kurup DB, Hamblin MR. Topical antimicrobials for burn wound infections. Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov. 2010;5:124–151. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sarabahi S. Recent advances in topical wound care. Indian J Plast Surg. 2012;45:379–387. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources