Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Sep 8;11(1):17843.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97370-9.

Virtual and augmented reality in the vestibular rehabilitation of peripheral vestibular disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Virtual and augmented reality in the vestibular rehabilitation of peripheral vestibular disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis

Austin Heffernan et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Vestibular rehabilitation therapy is an established treatment for patients with vestibular dysfunction. Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) can be utilised in vestibular rehabilitation. Evidence of the efficacy of VR and AR delivered rehabilitation in patients with peripheral vestibular disorders is reviewed. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsychInfo, PsychBITE, OTSeeker, Ei Compendex, IEE, Clinical trials.gov and WebofScience databases were searched. Reduction in vestibular dysfunction symptoms 0-3 months post-intervention was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included long-term symptom improvement and side effects. Risk of bias assessment and meta analyses were planned. Five studies meeting eligibility criteria were included. Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) scores 0-3 months post-intervention were reported by four studies. Meta-analysis identified a 1.13 (95% CI, - 1.74, - 0.52) standardized mean difference reduction in DHI in VR and AR treated patients compared to controls. Side effects reported by two studies were reduced by week four of VR intervention. Bias assessment identified DHI scores and side effects to be at high risk or of some concern. Adjunct VR interventions reduced patient DHI significantly more than vestibular rehabilitation alone 0-3 months post-intervention in adult patients diagnosed with unilateral vestibular disease. High quality studies are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of the article screening process for this systematic review. Flow chart was generated using Microsoft Word.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Post-intervention symptom index score (DHI) meta-analysis. SMD between VR/AR and control vestibular rehabilitation is listed. DHI dizziness handicap index, SMD standardized mean difference, VR virtual reality, AR augmented reality.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Post-intervention symptom index score (DHI) peripheral vestibular disorder subgroup analysis. SMDs between VR/AR and control vestibular rehabilitation for the group of UVH disorders studied by Micarelli et al. and Micarelli et al., MD alone and the vestibular disorders studied by Krueger are listed. AN acoustic neuroma, AR augmented reality, BPV benign positional vertigo, DHI dizziness handicap index, EH endolymphatic hydrops, LD labyrinth dysfunction, MD Meniere’s disease, MI motion intolerance, PCS previous cochlear surgery, PPS previous periosteal surgery, PVD peripheral vestibular disorder, PVNS previous vestibular nerve section, RHS Ramsay Hunt syndrome, SMD standardized mean differences, UVH unilateral vestibular hypofunction, VR virtual reality.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Post-intervention symptom index score (DHI) intervention type subgroup analysis. SMDs between VR/AR and control vestibular rehabilitation for AR, home based VR and in-clinic VR are listed. DHI dizziness handicap index, SMD standardized mean differences, VR virtual reality, AR augmented reality.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yardley L, Owen N, Nazareth I, Luxon L. Prevalence and presentation of dizziness in a general practice community sample of working age people. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 1998;5:1131–1135. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hanley K, Dowd TO, Considine N. A systematic review of vertigo in primary care. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2001;6:666–671. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jayarajan V, Rajenderkumar D. A survey of dizziness management in general practice. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2003;117:599–604. doi: 10.1258/002221503768199915. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sloane PD, et al. Management of dizziness in primary care. J. Am. Board Fam. Pract. 1994;8:1–8. - PubMed
    1. Arya AK, Nunez DA. What proportion of patients referred to an otolaryngology vertigo clinic have an otological cause for their symptoms? J. Laryngol. Otol. 2008;122:145–149. doi: 10.1017/S0022215107008559. - DOI - PubMed