Authors' Response to Gill et al Response
- PMID: 34498725
- DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14846
Authors' Response to Gill et al Response
Comment on
-
Cognitive bias in forensic pathology decisions.J Forensic Sci. 2021 Sep;66(5):1751-1757. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14697. Epub 2021 Feb 20. J Forensic Sci. 2021. PMID: 33608908 Free PMC article.
-
Authors' Response to Gill et al Commentary on.J Forensic Sci. 2021 Nov;66(6):2555-2556. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14850. Epub 2021 Sep 9. J Forensic Sci. 2021. PMID: 34498724 No abstract available.
-
Gill et al Response to Authors' Response.J Forensic Sci. 2021 Nov;66(6):2557-2558. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14840. Epub 2021 Sep 9. J Forensic Sci. 2021. PMID: 34498745 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Dror IE, Melinek J, Arden JL, Kukucka J, Hawkins S, Carter J, et al. Cognitive bias in forensic pathology decisions. J Forensic Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14697. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
-
- Eeden CA, Poot CJ, Koppen P. The forensic confirmation bias: A comparison between experts and novices. J Forensic Sci. 2018;64(1):120-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13817.
-
- Kahneman D, Sibony O, Sunstein CR. Noise: A flaw in human judgment. Glasgow, Scotland: William Collins Publishers; 2021.
-
- Dror IE. Cognitive and human factors in expert decision making: Six fallacies and the eight sources of bias. Anal Chem. 2020;92(12):7998-8004. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00704.
-
- Gill J. President’s welcome. National Association of Medical Examiners. https://name.memberclicks.net/president-s-welcome. Accessed 23 April 2021.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources