Authors' Response to Obenson Commentary on
- PMID: 34499358
- DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14847
Authors' Response to Obenson Commentary on
Comment on
-
Cognitive bias in forensic pathology decisions.J Forensic Sci. 2021 Sep;66(5):1751-1757. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14697. Epub 2021 Feb 20. J Forensic Sci. 2021. PMID: 33608908 Free PMC article.
-
Commentary on: Dror IE, Melinek J, Arden JL, Kukucka J, Hawkins S, Carter J, et al. Cognitive bias in forensic pathology decisions. J Forensic Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14697. Epub 2021 Feb 20.J Forensic Sci. 2021 Nov;66(6):2582-2584. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14855. Epub 2021 Sep 9. J Forensic Sci. 2021. PMID: 34499354 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Kahneman D, Sibony O, Sunstein CR. Noise: A flaw in human judgment. Glasgow, Scotland: William Collins Publishers; 2021.
-
- Dror IE. Cognitive and human factors in expert decision making: Six fallacies and the eight sources of bias. Anal Chem. 2020;92(12):7998-8004. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00704.
-
- Kunda Z. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol Bull. 1990;108(3):480-98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480.
-
- Dror IE, Melinek J, Arden JL, Kukucka J, Hawkins S, Carter J, et al. Cognitive bias in forensic pathology decisions. J Forensic Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14697. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources