Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 4;10(17):4007.
doi: 10.3390/jcm10174007.

Computed Tomography Structured Reporting in the Staging of Lymphoma: A Delphi Consensus Proposal

Affiliations

Computed Tomography Structured Reporting in the Staging of Lymphoma: A Delphi Consensus Proposal

Vincenza Granata et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Structured reporting (SR) in radiology is becoming increasingly necessary and has been recognized recently by major scientific societies. This study aims to build structured CT-based reports for lymphoma patients during the staging phase to improve communication between radiologists, members of multidisciplinary teams, and patients. A panel of expert radiologists, members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), was established. A modified Delphi process was used to develop the SR and to assess a level of agreement for all report sections. The Cronbach's alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was used to assess internal consistency for each section and to measure quality analysis according to the average inter-item correlation. The final SR version was divided into four sections: (a) Patient Clinical Data, (b) Clinical Evaluation, (c) Imaging Protocol, and (d) Report, including n = 13 items in the "Patient Clinical Data" section, n = 8 items in the "Clinical Evaluation" section, n = 9 items in the "Imaging Protocol" section, and n = 32 items in the "Report" section. Overall, 62 items were included in the final version of the SR. A dedicated section of significant images was added as part of the report. In the first Delphi round, all sections received more than a good rating (≥3). The overall mean score of the experts and the sum of score for structured report were 4.4 (range 1-5) and 1524 (mean value of 101.6 and standard deviation of 11.8). The Cα correlation coefficient was 0.89 in the first round. In the second Delphi round, all sections received more than an excellent rating (≥4). The overall mean score of the experts and the sum of scores for structured report were 4.9 (range 3-5) and 1694 (mean value of 112.9 and standard deviation of 4.0). The Cα correlation coefficient was 0.87 in this round. The highest overall means value, highest sum of scores of the panelists, and smallest standard deviation values of the evaluations in this round reflect the increase of the internal consistency and agreement among experts in the second round compared to first round. The accurate statement of imaging data given to referring physicians is critical for patient care; the information contained affects both the decision-making process and the subsequent treatment. The radiology report is the most important source of clinical imaging information. It conveys critical information about the patient's health and the radiologist's interpretation of medical findings. It also communicates information to the referring physicians and records this information for future clinical and research use. The present SR was generated based on a multi-round consensus-building Delphi exercise and uses standardized terminology and structures, in order to adhere to diagnostic/therapeutic recommendations and facilitate enrolment in clinical trials, to reduce any ambiguity that may arise from non-conventional language, and to enable better communication between radiologists and clinicians.

Keywords: computed tomography; free text report; lymphoma; radiology report; structured report.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Onaindia A., Santiago-Quispe N., Iglesias-Martinez E., Romero-Abrio C. Molecular Update and Evolving Classification of Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Cancers. 2021;13:3352. doi: 10.3390/cancers13133352. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Leval L., Jaffe E.S. Lymphoma Classification. Cancer J. 2020;26:176–185. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000451. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kirienko M., Ninatti G., Cozzi L., Voulaz E., Gennaro N., Barajon I., Ricci F., Carlo-Stella C., Zucali P., Sollini M., et al. Computed tomography (CT)-derived radiomic features differentiate prevascular mediastinum masses as thymic neoplasms versus lymphomas. La Radiol. Med. 2020;125:951–960. doi: 10.1007/s11547-020-01188-w. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lian S., Zhang C., Chi J., Huang Y., Shi F., Xie C. Differentiation between nasopharyngeal carcinoma and lymphoma at the primary site using whole-tumor histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps. La Radiol. Med. 2020;125:647–653. doi: 10.1007/s11547-020-01152-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zanoni L., Mattana F., Calabrò D., Paccagnella A., Broccoli A., Nanni C., Fanti S. Overview and recent advances in PET/CT imaging in lymphoma and multiple myeloma. Eur. J. Radiol. 2021;141:109793. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109793. - DOI - PubMed