Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep 2;22(17):9550.
doi: 10.3390/ijms22179550.

The Role of Somatic Mutations on the Immune Response of the Tumor Microenvironment in Prostate Cancer

Affiliations
Review

The Role of Somatic Mutations on the Immune Response of the Tumor Microenvironment in Prostate Cancer

Camila Morais Melo et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Immunotherapy has improved patient survival in many types of cancer, but for prostate cancer, initial results with immunotherapy have been disappointing. Prostate cancer is considered an immunologically excluded or cold tumor, unable to generate an effective T-cell response against cancer cells. However, a small but significant percentage of patients do respond to immunotherapy, suggesting that some specific molecular subtypes of this tumor may have a better response to checkpoint inhibitors. Recent findings suggest that, in addition to their function as cancer genes, somatic mutations of PTEN, TP53, RB1, CDK12, and DNA repair, or specific activation of regulatory pathways, such as ETS or MYC, may also facilitate immune evasion of the host response against cancer. This review presents an update of recent discoveries about the role that the common somatic mutations can play in changing the tumor microenvironment and immune response against prostate cancer. We describe how detailed molecular genetic analyses of the tumor microenvironment of prostate cancer using mouse models and human tumors are providing new insights into the cell types and pathways mediating immune responses. These analyses are helping researchers to design drug combinations that are more likely to target the molecular and immunological pathways that underlie treatment failure.

Keywords: checkpoint blockade; genomic instability; immune evasion; immunotherapy; innate and adaptive immune system; mouse models of cancer; oncogenes; single-cell transcriptomics; spatial imaging; tumor suppressor genes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Immunological classification of tumors—inflamed (left) with high degree of cytotoxic T-cell infiltration, immune-excluded (center) with presence of T cells at invasive margins but absence in tumor tissues, and immune desert (right) absence of T cells within tumor and at margins. Prostate cancer has features of both an immune desert and an excluded phenotype (figure based on ANANDAPPA; WU; OTT, 2020) [6].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mutation and gene expression changes leading to cellular and immune evasion effects in the TME of PCa. The various somatic mutations can influence the non-cancerous cell in the tumor microenvironment of prostate cancer. CCL2 (C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 2), CD8+ T cell (cytotoxic T lymphocyte), CSF1 (colony Stimulating Factor 1), CXCL8 (C-X-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 8), DC (dendritic cells), ERG (ETS Transcription Factor ERG), FoxP3+ (Forkhead box p3), FoxP3+ T cell (regulatory T lymphocyte), IDO1 (indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase 1), IL-1β (interleukin 1, beta), IL-8 (interleukin 8), MDSC (myeloid-derived suppressor cell), NK (natural killer cell), PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homologue), TGFβ (transforming growth factor beta), TME (tumor microenvironment), TMPRSS2 (Transmembrane Serine Protease 2), TP53 (Protein Coding), WNT (important pathway for immune cell maintenance and renewal). Up arrows (increase). Down arrows (decrease) [37,48,50,51,52,54,55,85,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100].

References

    1. Hanahan D., Weinberg R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen D.S., Mellman I. Oncology meets immunology: The cancer-immunity cycle. Immunity. 2013;39:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Waldman A.D., Fritz J.M., Lenardo M.J. A guide to cancer immunotherapy: From T cell basic science to clinical practice. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020;20:651–668. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0306-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Topalian S.L., Hodi F.S., Brahmer J.R., Gettinger S.N., Smith D.C., McDermott D.F., Powderly J.D., Carvajal R.D., Sosman J.A., Atkins M.B., et al. Safety, Activity, and Immune Correlates of Anti–PD-1 Antibody in Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:2443–2454. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200690. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lu S., Stein J.E., Rimm D.L., Wang D.W., Bell J.M., Johnson D.B., Sosman J.A., Schalper K.A., Anders R.A., Wang H., et al. Comparison of Biomarker Modalities for Predicting Response to PD-1/PD-L1 Checkpoint Blockade: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:1195–1204. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1549. - DOI - PMC - PubMed