Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 25;13(17):2849.
doi: 10.3390/polym13172849.

Interfacial Adhesion and Mechanical Properties of Wood-Polymer Hybrid Composites Prepared by Injection Molding

Affiliations

Interfacial Adhesion and Mechanical Properties of Wood-Polymer Hybrid Composites Prepared by Injection Molding

Alexander Stadlmann et al. Polymers (Basel). .

Abstract

Birch (Betula pendula Roth.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) solid wood and plywood were overmolded with polyamide 6 (PA 6) and polypropylene (PP) to investigate their mechanical properties and interfacial adhesion. In the case of PA 6, maximum tensile shear strengths values of more than 8 to 9 MPa were obtained for birch and beech, respectively. The values are comparable to bond strengths of commercial joints bonded with formaldehyde-containing amino-plastics. Perpendicular to the wood elements, bond strength values of 3 MPa was achieved for PA 6. The penetration of the polymers into the wood structure results in a non-densified interphase and subsequent plastic deformation of the wood structure beyond the interphase. These compressed areas influenced the interfacial adhesion and mechanical interlocking. SEM and XPS analysis revealed different interpenetration behavior of the polymers into the wood structure, with chemical interaction confirmed only for wood and PA 6 but not PP.

Keywords: XPS; interfacial bond strength; wood-polymer composites; wood-polymer interface.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure A1
Figure A1
Representative deconvoluted XPS spectrum with relative areas of the C 1, C 2, C 3 and C 4 binding energy regions of the birch solid wood specimens, overmolded with PA 6, within the cross section of a sample.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of the overmolded plywood boards (a) and schematic representation of the specimens for the tensile strength perpendicular to the plane of the board σP (b), tensile strength perpendicular to the edge σE (c) and tensile shear strength σS (d).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic of the overmolded solid wood (a) and representation of the specimens for the tensile shear strength σS (b) according to ÖNORM EN 302-1 [34].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schematic of the test setup for overmolded plywood specimens for strength measurements according to DIN 52 188 [37] and DIN EN 302-1 [34]: (a) test setup for tensile strength perpendicular to the plane of the board σP, (b) test setup for tensile strength perpendicular to the edge σE, and (c) test setup for tensile shear strength σS.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Micrograph of the overmolded solid wood specimens for X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analyses (XPS) used to determine the elementary distribution of C, O and N and for high-resolution deconvoluted XPS spectra within the samples cross section, indicating the position of the X-ray beam.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Strength properties of 121 birch plywood specimens and 118 beech plywood specimens overmolded with PP at three different injection temperatures. σP is the average tensile strength perpendicular to the plane of the board, σE is the average tensile strength perpendicular to the edge, σS is the average tensile shear strength and n is the number of the samples tested. The whiskers show minimum and maximum values. X is the mean value. ° indicate values of statistical outliers and—is the median.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Average tensile shear strength σS of birch solid wood specimens and beech solid wood overmolded with PA 6 and PP, respectively; n is the number of the samples. The whiskers show minimum and maximum values. X is the mean value. ° indicate values of statistical outliers and—is the median.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Representative SEM micrographs recorded on the cross-section of the overmolded specimens for birch solid wood (1a2b) and beech solid wood (3a4b); b represents always the detailed inset of a. (1a), (1b), (3a) and (3b) show samples overmolded in radial direction and (2a), (2b), (4a) and (4b) represents samples overmolded in tangential direction.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Mean values and standard deviation of the XPS results: Carbon peak components at C 1 and C 3 for birch solid wood (a) and beech solid wood (b) overmolded with PA 6 and the C 1 and C 2 for birch solid wood (c) and beech solid wood (d) overmolded with PP.

References

    1. Leitgeb W., Kerschbichler S., Jost T., Mayrhofer P., Wagner W., Müller U. IHD, Konferenzproceedings—2. Interdisziplinäres Fahrzeugkolloquium; Dresden, Germany: 2016. Holz im strukturellen Fahrzeugbau; pp. 1–118.
    1. Statistisches Bundesamt. [(accessed on 16 August 2021)]; Available online: https://www.destatis.de/Europa/DE/Thema/Umwelt-Energie/CO2_Strassenverke....
    1. Mair-Bauernfeind C., Zimek M., Asada R., Bauernfeind D., Baumgartner R.J., Stern T. Prospective sustainability assessment: The case of wood in automotive applications. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2020;25:2027–2049. doi: 10.1007/s11367-020-01803-y. - DOI
    1. Franzini F., Berghäll S., Toppinen A., Toivonen R. Comparing wood versus concrete: An explorative study of municipal civil servants’ beliefs about multistory building materials in Finland. For. Prod. J. 2021;71:65–76. doi: 10.13073/FPJ-D-20-00038. - DOI
    1. Asada R., Cardellini G., Mair-Bauernfeind C., Wenger J., Haas V., Holzer D., Stern T. Effective bioeconomy? A MRIO-based socioeconomic and environmental impact assessment of generic sectoral innovations. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 2020;153:119946. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119946. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources