Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 3;13(17):2986.
doi: 10.3390/polym13172986.

Mechanical Properties of Flexible TPU-Based 3D Printed Lattice Structures: Role of Lattice Cut Direction and Architecture

Affiliations

Mechanical Properties of Flexible TPU-Based 3D Printed Lattice Structures: Role of Lattice Cut Direction and Architecture

Victor Beloshenko et al. Polymers (Basel). .

Abstract

This study addresses the mechanical behavior of lattice materials based on flexible thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) with honeycomb and gyroid architecture fabricated by 3D printing. Tensile, compression, and three-point bending tests were chosen as mechanical testing methods. The honeycomb architecture was found to provide higher values of rigidity (by 30%), strength (by 25%), plasticity (by 18%), and energy absorption (by 42%) of the flexible TPU lattice compared to the gyroid architecture. The strain recovery is better in the case of gyroid architecture (residual strain of 46% vs. 31%). TPUs with honeycomb architecture are characterized by anisotropy of mechanical properties in tensile and three-point bending tests. The obtained results are explained by the peculiarities of the lattice structure at meso- and macroscopic level and by the role of the pore space.

Keywords: 3D printing; flexible TPU; internal architecture; lattice material; mechanical properties.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The peculiarities of the multiscale structure of flexible TPU lattice materials with honeycomb and gyroid architecture as well as the arrangement of A- and B-type test specimens.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Isometric views of individual cells of honeycomb (a,b) and gyroid (c,d) architectures.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Representative stress–strain curves of lattice flexible TPU under tension. (a) honeycomb, (b) gyroid architecture.
Figure 4
Figure 4
DMA curves for lattice flexible TPU with honeycomb architecture. (a)–E’(T), (b)–E’’(T), (c)–tgδ(T) dependencies.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Representative stress–strain curves of lattice flexible TPU under compression. (a)–honeycomb, (b)–gyroid architecture. The inset shows the enlarged initial part of the same curves.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Energy absorption (a) and specific energy absorption (b) of the lattice flexible TPU structures.

References

    1. Bai L., Gong C., Chen X., Sun Y., Xin L., Pu H., Peng Y., Jun Luo J. Mechanical properties and energy absorption capabilities of functionally graded lattice structures: Experiments and simulations. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2000;182:105735. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105735. - DOI
    1. Yan C., Hao L., Hussein A., Bubb S.L., Young P., Raymont D. Evaluation of light-weight AlSi10Mg periodic cellular lattice structures fabricated via direct metal laser sintering. J. Mater. Proc. Techn. 2014;214:856–864. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.12.004. - DOI
    1. Yan C., Hao L., Hussein A., Young P., Raymont D. Advanced lightweight 316L stainless steel cellular lattice structures fabricated via selective laser melting. Mater. Des. 2014;55:533–541. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.027. - DOI
    1. Li Y., Gu D. Parametric analysis of thermal behavior during selective laser melting additive manufacturing of aluminum alloy powder. Mater. Des. 2014;63:856–867. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.006. - DOI
    1. Hakamada M., Kuromura T., Chen Y., Kusuda H., Mabuchi M. High sound absorption of porous aluminum fabricated by spacer method. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006;88:254106. doi: 10.1063/1.2216104. - DOI