Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Aug 24;13(17):4251.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13174251.

Biomarker in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Biomarker in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review

Cécile Manceau et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Active surveillance (AS) in prostate cancer (PCa) represents a curative alternative for men with localised low-risk PCa. Continuous improvement of AS patient's selection and surveillance modalities aims at reducing misclassification, simplifying modalities of surveillance and decreasing need for invasive procedures such repeated biopsies. Biomarkers represent interesting tools to evaluate PCa diagnosis and prognosis, of which many are readily available or under evaluation. The aim of this review is to investigate the biomarker performance for AS selection and patient outcome prediction. Blood, urinary and tissue biomarkers were studied and a brief description of use was proposed along with a summary of major findings. Biomarkers represent promising tools which could be part of a more tailored risk AS strategy aiming to offer personalized medicine and to individualize the treatment and monitoring of each patient. The usefulness of biomarkers has mainly been suggested for AS selection, whereas few studies have investigated their role during the monitoring phase. Randomized prospective studies dealing with imaging are needed as well as larger prospective studies with long-term follow-up and strong oncologic endpoints.

Keywords: active surveillance; biomarker; blood biomarker; prostate cancer; tissue biomarker; urine biomarker.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Literature search and selection of studies flowchart.

References

    1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Draisma G., Boer R., Otto S.J., Van Der Cruijsen I.W., Damhuis R.A.M., Schröder F.H., De Koning H.J. Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening: Estimates from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2003;95:868–878. doi: 10.1093/jnci/95.12.868. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andriole G.L., Crawford E.D., Grubb R.L., Buys S.S., Chia D., Church T.R., Fouad M.N., Isaacs C., Kvale P.A., Reding D.J., et al. Prostate Cancer Screening in the Randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial: Mortality Results after 13 Years of Follow-up. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2012;104:125–132. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr500. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shoag J.E., Mittal S., Hu J.C. Reevaluating PSA Testing Rates in the PLCO Trial. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;374:1795–1796. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1515131. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schröder F.H., Hugosson J., Roobol-Bouts M., Tammela T.L., Ciatto S., Nelen V., Kwiatkowski M., Lujan M., Lilja H., Zappa M., et al. Prostate-Cancer Mortality at 11 Years of Follow-up. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:981–990. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113135. - DOI - PMC - PubMed