Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 27;13(17):4344.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13174344.

Implementation of Multigene Germline and Parallel Somatic Genetic Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: SIGNPOST Study

Affiliations

Implementation of Multigene Germline and Parallel Somatic Genetic Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: SIGNPOST Study

Dhivya Chandrasekaran et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

We present findings of a cancer multidisciplinary-team (MDT) coordinated mainstreaming pathway of unselected 5-panel germline BRCA1/BRCA2/RAD51C/RAD51D/BRIP1 and parallel somatic BRCA1/BRCA2 testing in all women with epithelial-OC and highlight the discordance between germline and somatic testing strategies across two cancer centres. Patients were counselled and consented by a cancer MDT member. The uptake of parallel multi-gene germline and somatic testing was 97.7%. Counselling by clinical-nurse-specialist more frequently needed >1 consultation (53.6% (30/56)) compared to a medical (15.0% (21/137)) or surgical oncologist (15.3% (17/110)) (p < 0.001). The median age was 54 (IQR = 51-62) years in germline pathogenic-variant (PV) versus 61 (IQR = 51-71) in BRCA wild-type (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in distribution of PVs by ethnicity, stage, surgery timing or resection status. A total of 15.5% germline and 7.8% somatic BRCA1/BRCA2 PVs were identified. A total of 2.3% patients had RAD51C/RAD51D/BRIP1 PVs. A total of 11% germline PVs were large-genomic-rearrangements and missed by somatic testing. A total of 20% germline PVs are missed by somatic first BRCA-testing approach and 55.6% germline PVs missed by family history ascertainment. The somatic testing failure rate is higher (23%) for patients undergoing diagnostic biopsies. Our findings favour a prospective parallel somatic and germline panel testing approach as a clinically efficient strategy to maximise variant identification. UK Genomics test-directory criteria should be expanded to include a panel of OC genes.

Keywords: BRCA; BRIP1; RAD51C; RAD51D; genetic testing; germline; ovarian cancer; somatic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

R.M. declares research funding from Barts and the London Charity and Rosetrees Trust outside this work, an honorarium for grant review from Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research and honorarium for advisory board membership from AstraZeneca/MSD/GSK. R.M. is supported by an NHS Innovation Accelerator (NIA) Fellowship for population testing. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results. FG declares research funding from The NHS Grampian Endowment Fund, Medtronic and Karl Storz outside this work.

References

    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer . A Tool That Predicts the Future Cancer Incidence and Mortality Burden Worldwide from the Current Estimates in 2018 Up Until 2040. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); Lyon, France: 2018. Cancer Tomorrow.
    1. CRUK . Ovarian Cancer Incidence. Cancer Research UK; London, UK: 2017. Ovarian cancer statistics.
    1. Collins F.S., Varmus H. A new initiative on precision medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;372:793–795. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1500523. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kuchenbaecker K.B., Hopper J.L., Barnes D.R., Phillips K.A., Mooij T.M., Roos-Blom M.J., Jervis S., van Leeuwen F.E., Milne R.L., Andrieu N., et al. Risks of Breast, Ovarian, and Contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. JAMA. 2017;317:2402–2416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7112. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schettini F., Giudici F., Bernocchi O., Sirico M., Corona S.P., Giuliano M., Locci M., Paris I., Scambia G., De Placido S., et al. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in solid tumours: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Cancer. 2021;149:134–152. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.02.035. - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding