Evaluation and Management of Impacted Teeth in the Adolescent Patient
- PMID: 34503668
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2021.07.003
Evaluation and Management of Impacted Teeth in the Adolescent Patient
Abstract
The most common oral and maxillofacial surgical procedure in adolescents is excision of impacted third molars. Adolescent patients should be evaluated for third molars starting around age 16 years unless symptomatic at an earlier age. The dental examination should include panorex imaging to assess development, pathologic condition, and possibility of eruption versus impaction. Various classification systems are available to identify the position and difficulty of the proposed surgical procedure. Retained impacted teeth increase the patient's risk of various morbidities including recurrent infection, damage to adjacent teeth, cysts and other lesions, and unexplained pain.
Keywords: Classification of impacted teeth; Indications and contraindications; Introduction and incidence; Technique.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
A comparative evaluation of film and digital panoramic radiographs in the assessment of position and morphology of impacted mandibular third molars.Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Mar-Apr;22(2):219-24. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.84290. Indian J Dent Res. 2011. PMID: 21891889
-
Radiographic study of the positional changes and eruption of impacted third molars in young adults of an Asian Indian population.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Aug;66(8):1617-24. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.015. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008. PMID: 18634949
-
Impaction of lower third molars and their association with age: radiological perspectives.BMC Oral Health. 2018 Apr 4;18(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0519-1. BMC Oral Health. 2018. PMID: 29618350 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 4;5(5):CD003879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003879.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32368796 Free PMC article.
-
[Should we or should we not extract impacted teeth?].Rev Belge Med Dent (1984). 1995;50(2):29-39. Rev Belge Med Dent (1984). 1995. PMID: 7480929 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Efficacy of Coumarin and Chymotrypsin/Trypsin in Patients Undergoing Surgical Removal of Lower Third Molars: A Prospective Study.Cureus. 2023 Dec 18;15(12):e50750. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50750. eCollection 2023 Dec. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38239527 Free PMC article.
-
The Positional Relationship Between the Mandibular Canal and the Lower Third Molar Determined on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 17;61(7):1291. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071291. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025. PMID: 40731920 Free PMC article.
-
Application of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Risk Assessment of Lower Third Molar Surgery.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 1;13(5):919. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13050919. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36900063 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Management of a Geriatric Patient Using Dabigatran Therapy on Dentigerous Cyst with Oral Bleeding.J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 5;13(5):1499. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051499. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38592423 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Six-Month Soft Tissues Healing after Lower Third Molar Extraction: Comparison of Two Different Access Flaps.J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 9;12(22):7017. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227017. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38002631 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources